SkipCaptcha
35,519
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 48:
Line 48: − +
→Judicial Philosophy
*''[[Parents Involved in Cmty. Schs. v. Seattle Sch. Dist. No. 1]]''
*''[[Parents Involved in Cmty. Schs. v. Seattle Sch. Dist. No. 1]]''
*''[[Morse v. Frederick]]''
*''[[Morse v. Frederick]]''
*''[[FEC v. Wis. Right to Life, Inc.]]'' (joining Justice Souter's dissent)
*''FEC v. Wis. Right to Life, Inc.'' (joining Justice Souter's dissent)
According to Senator [[Arlen Specter]], he had a chance encounter with Justice Breyer at a summer meeting after the end of the 2006-2007 term, and Specter publicly stated that Justice Breyer told him there were "eight" decisions in which the [[Roberts Court]] had overruled precedent.<ref>[https://www.politico.com/news/stories/0707/5099.html Specter to probe Supreme Court decisions], [[Politico]]</ref> Specter then publicly said he was going to review the testimony provided by nominees Chief Justice [[John Roberts]] and Justice [[Sam Alito]] to the Senate Judiciary Committee to see if they were abiding by it.
According to Senator [[Arlen Specter]], he had a chance encounter with Justice Breyer at a summer meeting after the end of the 2006-2007 term, and Specter publicly stated that Justice Breyer told him there were "eight" decisions in which the [[Roberts Court]] had overruled precedent.<ref>[https://www.politico.com/news/stories/0707/5099.html Specter to probe Supreme Court decisions], [[Politico]]</ref> Specter then publicly said he was going to review the testimony provided by nominees Chief Justice [[John Roberts]] and Justice [[Sam Alito]] to the Senate Judiciary Committee to see if they were abiding by it.