Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
293,721
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 57:
Line 57: + + + + + + + + +
→Isikoff
::::<Digression> Okay, so let's ask again, ''What is the real story?'' The real story could actually have nothing to do with Assange, but rather payback by a partisan operative and Hillary Clinton lover for the illegal leak about Hillary Clinton. There's obviously divisions within the interagency consensus (otherwise known as the Deep State) on any matter or subject. It looks like Hillary made a proposal that lacked any legal basis and Pompeo signed onto that proposal by taking the first step to make it legal. But the Isikoff story could also be just partisan payback and not motivated by sympathy for Assange at all. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 15:35, September 30, 2021 (EDT)
::::<Digression> Okay, so let's ask again, ''What is the real story?'' The real story could actually have nothing to do with Assange, but rather payback by a partisan operative and Hillary Clinton lover for the illegal leak about Hillary Clinton. There's obviously divisions within the interagency consensus (otherwise known as the Deep State) on any matter or subject. It looks like Hillary made a proposal that lacked any legal basis and Pompeo signed onto that proposal by taking the first step to make it legal. But the Isikoff story could also be just partisan payback and not motivated by sympathy for Assange at all. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 15:35, September 30, 2021 (EDT)
:::::But at the end of the day, it is ''who'' Pompeo wanted dead that matters. Does it not?--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 13:33, October 1, 2021 (EDT)
:::::But at the end of the day, it is ''who'' Pompeo wanted dead that matters. Does it not?--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 13:33, October 1, 2021 (EDT)
::::'''Update:''' [https://consortiumnews.com/2021/10/02/what-the-yahoo-assange-report-got-wrong/ What the Yahoo! Assange Report Got Wrong], excerpted:
:::::''The reaction to the 7,000-word piece by Yahoo! News on Sunday proves the axiom that until something appears in the mainstream media, it didn’t happen.
The thrust of the Yahoo! article is that the Obama administration was good to Assange while elements of the Trump administration plotted the assassination or abduction before taking the acceptable path of making a legal case against Assange. But the legal case is also troubling.
The article also sets up a misleading idea that the CIA’s extrajudicial methods, such as assassination and abduction, sometimes as freelance acts without a presidential directive,''
::::There is a whole lot more.
::::''The Yahoo! report provides important new details of facts reported a year ago, but contains several errors, including a fabricated story about Russian operatives ....while at the same time providing important new details about inside-Washington deliberations on how the plot came about.''
:::::[[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 16:20, October 2, 2021 (EDT)