Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
291 bytes added ,  23:27, October 8, 2021
A writer who left the ''National Review'', Victor Davis Hanson, explained his dismay with it: "I thought they would be champions of the middle class, but I don’t think they were. I don’t think they wanted to be."
Line 2: Line 2:     
The ''National Review'' is dominated by [[Never Trump movement|Never Trumpers]].<ref>Nolte, John (July 29, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2019/07/29/nolte-the-indecency-of-national-review/ Nolte: The Indecency of ‘National Review’]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved July 29, 2019.</ref>  The ''National Review'' joined with [[liberals]] in criticizing a high school boy who peacefully stood his ground against political hostility.  ''National Review'' was humiliated by having to pull its article that falsely attacked the [[Kentucky]] high students by claiming that they "might as well have just spit on the [[Cross]]."<ref>https://www.thewrap.com/national-review-pulls-article-saying-covington-students-might-as-well-have-just-spit-on-the-cross/</ref>
 
The ''National Review'' is dominated by [[Never Trump movement|Never Trumpers]].<ref>Nolte, John (July 29, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2019/07/29/nolte-the-indecency-of-national-review/ Nolte: The Indecency of ‘National Review’]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved July 29, 2019.</ref>  The ''National Review'' joined with [[liberals]] in criticizing a high school boy who peacefully stood his ground against political hostility.  ''National Review'' was humiliated by having to pull its article that falsely attacked the [[Kentucky]] high students by claiming that they "might as well have just spit on the [[Cross]]."<ref>https://www.thewrap.com/national-review-pulls-article-saying-covington-students-might-as-well-have-just-spit-on-the-cross/</ref>
 +
 +
A writer who left the ''National Review'', Victor Davis Hanson, explained his dismay with it: "I thought they would be champions of the middle class, but I don’t think they were. I don’t think they wanted to be."<ref>https://amgreatness.com/2021/10/06/why-i-left-national-review/</ref>
    
The ''National Review'' is somewhat [[neoconservative]] in philosophy, though not as neoconservative as the ''[[Weekly Standard]]''. It also is prominent in the [[Never Trump movement]]. It has promoted numerous left-wing policies.<ref name="TrojanHorse">Byas, Steve (January 18, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/item/31222-national-review-continues-to-be-a-trojan-horse-inside-the-gates-of-conservatism National Review Continues to be a Trojan Horse Inside the Gates of Conservatism]. ''The New American''. Retrieved January 18, 2019.</ref>
 
The ''National Review'' is somewhat [[neoconservative]] in philosophy, though not as neoconservative as the ''[[Weekly Standard]]''. It also is prominent in the [[Never Trump movement]]. It has promoted numerous left-wing policies.<ref name="TrojanHorse">Byas, Steve (January 18, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/item/31222-national-review-continues-to-be-a-trojan-horse-inside-the-gates-of-conservatism National Review Continues to be a Trojan Horse Inside the Gates of Conservatism]. ''The New American''. Retrieved January 18, 2019.</ref>
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,364

edits

Navigation menu