Changes

A writer who left the ''National Review'', Victor Davis Hanson, explained his dismay with it: "I thought they would be champions of the middle class, but I don’t think they were. I don’t think they wanted to be."<ref>https://amgreatness.com/2021/10/06/why-i-left-national-review/</ref>

A writer who left the ''National Review'', Victor Davis Hanson, explained his dismay with it: "I thought they would be champions of the middle class, but I don’t think they were. I don’t think they wanted to be."<ref>https://amgreatness.com/2021/10/06/why-i-left-national-review/</ref>

The ''National Review'' is somewhat [[neoconservative]] in philosophy, though not as neoconservative as the ''[[Weekly Standard]]''. It also is prominent in the [[Never Trump movement]]. It has promoted numerous left-wing policies.<ref name="TrojanHorse">Byas, Steve (January 18, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/item/31222-national-review-continues-to-be-a-trojan-horse-inside-the-gates-of-conservatism National Review Continues to be a Trojan Horse Inside the Gates of Conservatism]. ''The New American''. Retrieved January 18, 2019.</ref>

The ''National Review'' is somewhat [[neoconservative]] in philosophy, though not as neoconservative as the ''[[Weekly Standard]]'' was. The ''National Review'' is prominent in the [[Never Trump movement]]. It has promoted numerous left-wing policies.<ref name="TrojanHorse">Byas, Steve (January 18, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/item/31222-national-review-continues-to-be-a-trojan-horse-inside-the-gates-of-conservatism National Review Continues to be a Trojan Horse Inside the Gates of Conservatism]. ''The New American''. Retrieved January 18, 2019.</ref>

==Early history==

==Early history==