172
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 476:
Line 476: + + + + + + + + + +
Crackpot
::::I think the only question is whether U.S. Citizens who have been classified as enemy combatants enjoy such rights. Any foreign national, picked up and held on foreign soil--they need to seek the protection of their own country's constitution...but my opinion is a matter for discussion, not an article. [[User:HeartOfGold|<big>HG</big><sub><small>HeartOfGold</small></sub>]] [[User_talk:HeartOfGold|<sup><small>talk</small></sup>]] 01:26, 22 May 2007 (EDT)
::::I think the only question is whether U.S. Citizens who have been classified as enemy combatants enjoy such rights. Any foreign national, picked up and held on foreign soil--they need to seek the protection of their own country's constitution...but my opinion is a matter for discussion, not an article. [[User:HeartOfGold|<big>HG</big><sub><small>HeartOfGold</small></sub>]] [[User_talk:HeartOfGold|<sup><small>talk</small></sup>]] 01:26, 22 May 2007 (EDT)
== Crackpot ==
I agree with point 4 removal, as it was probably redundant, but I do think we ought to re-insert some of point 3 back, in particular the bits in bold I think are important:
... when usually there is no "paradigm" in any Kuhnian sense, but merely a consensus view about a small scientific question. '''One basic philosophical failure of the crackpot is the failure to understand that "paradigms" and "paradigm shifts" are usually recognized after the fact by historians and almost never during the time of the shift''', and secondly that paradigm shifts are almost always the work of younger scientists and not of older scientists.
I will not revert the edit, but can we discuss this point?
--[[User:AvengingAngel|AvengingAngel]] 15:52, 28 May 2007 (EDT)