| Line 30: |
Line 30: |
| | |TV-14 | | |TV-14 |
| | |The 2016 HBO film based on the presidency of Democrat [[Lyndon B. Johnson]] is a good example of a historical revisionist film, palatable for liberals' regressive dominion of the media. Liberals seized the opportunity with the film to distort history in order to hold Johnson in high regard and also ignored many of the President's faults, including his racism, the War on Poverty and how it created a welfare state which, by design, destroyed untold numbers of African American families. | | |The 2016 HBO film based on the presidency of Democrat [[Lyndon B. Johnson]] is a good example of a historical revisionist film, palatable for liberals' regressive dominion of the media. Liberals seized the opportunity with the film to distort history in order to hold Johnson in high regard and also ignored many of the President's faults, including his racism, the War on Poverty and how it created a welfare state which, by design, destroyed untold numbers of African American families. |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |''American Psycho''
| |
| − | |2000
| |
| − | |R
| |
| − | |Don't be fooled by the false patriotic title. It's the most [[Anti-American]] film you'll ever see because it attempts to pass an Investment Banker off as a secret serial killer.<ref>https://www.dailyscript.com/scripts/American_Psycho_Harron_Turner.html</ref><ref>https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/finance-dictionary/what-is-mergers-acquisitions</ref>
| |
| − | |$15,070,285
| |
| | |- | | |- |
| | |''Assault on Wall Street'' | | |''Assault on Wall Street'' |
| Line 86: |
Line 80: |
| | |$67,800,000 | | |$67,800,000 |
| | |- | | |- |
| − | |''Borat 2'' | + | |''Borat Subsequent Moviefilm'' |
| | |2020 | | |2020 |
| | |R | | |R |
| − | |Sacha Baron Cohen goes a step further making a pro-Biden propaganda film. He tries to blame [[COVID-19]] on [[Donald Trump]] and falsely accuses him of being a [[fascist]]. He makes matters worse when he harasses patriots like [[Mike Pence]] and [[Rudy Giuliani]] and falsely portrays them as pedophiles. | + | |Sacha Baron Cohen goes a step further making a pro-Biden propaganda film. He tries to blame [[COVID-19]] on [[Donald Trump]], and falsely accuses him of being a [[fascist]]. He makes matters worse when he harasses [[Mike Pence]] and [[Rudy Giuliani]], and falsely portrays them as pedophiles. |
| | | | | | |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 113: |
Line 107: |
| | |1972 | | |1972 |
| | |PG | | |PG |
| − | |This "comedy" fails to be a political satire as it fails to lampoon both sides of the coin and supports [[George McGovern]] at every turn. It was released during the 1972 election year as a smear campaign against [[Richard Nixon]] and his conservative colleagues. Conservative star [[James Stewart]] refused to star in it for that reason.<ref>https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0068334/trivia?ref_=tt_trv_trv</ref> | + | |This "comedy" fails to be a political satire as it fails to lampoon both sides of the coin and supports [[George McGovern]] at every turn. It was released during the 1972 election year as a smear campaign against [[Richard Nixon]] and his conservative colleagues. Conservative star [[James Stewart]] refused to star in it for that reason<ref>https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0068334/trivia?ref_=tt_trv_trv</ref>. |
| | | | | | |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 131: |
Line 125: |
| | |2008; 2009 | | |2008; 2009 |
| | |NR | | |NR |
| − | |As implied by the name, the film is a two-part biopic for the Argentine Marxist terrorist and mass murderer [[Che Guevara]], who is treated sympathetically as a "martyr" for Communism. | + | |As implied by the name, the film is a two-part biopic for the Argentine [[Marxist]] terrorist and mass murderer [[Che Guevara]], who is treated sympathetically as a "martyr" for [[Communism]]. |
| | |US$40.9 million | | |US$40.9 million |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 143: |
Line 137: |
| | |1972 | | |1972 |
| | |X | | |X |
| − | |Revels in sex and violence and mocks Christian prison education. Depicts police as thugs recruited from street gangs. | + | |Revels in sex and violence and mocks Christian prison education. Depicts police as thugs recruited from street gangs. |
| | | | | | |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 149: |
Line 143: |
| | |2000 | | |2000 |
| | |R | | |R |
| − | |This film about the 2000 presidential election is little more than a pro-[[Al Gore]] propaganda piece by liberal studio executives and [[Hollywood values]]. Conservative star Gary Oldman also told IGN that the film was to supposed to be apolitical, but it was edited to vilify Republicans.<ref>http://www.ign.com/articles/2001/02/26/interview-with-gary-oldman</ref> | + | |This film about the 2000 presidential election is little more than a pro-[[Al Gore]] propaganda piece by liberal studio executives and [[Hollywood values]]. Conservative star Gary Oldman also told IGN that the film was to supposed to be apolitical, but it was edited to vilify Republicans<ref>http://www.ign.com/articles/2001/02/26/interview-with-gary-oldman</ref>. |
| | |$17,872,723 | | |$17,872,723 |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 209: |
Line 203: |
| | |1940 | | |1940 |
| | |NR | | |NR |
| − | |This anti-Semitic Nazi propaganda film was made with direct input from Adolf Hitler, who made sure the anti-Semitism was as blunt and direct as possible. Most audiences were shocked at the crudity of the messages. | + | |This anti-Semitic Nazi propaganda film was made with direct input from [[Adolf Hitler]], who made sure the anti-Semitism was as blunt and direct as possible. Most audiences were shocked at the crudity of the messages. |
| | |Unknown | | |Unknown |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 239: |
Line 233: |
| | |2012 | | |2012 |
| | |Not Rated | | |Not Rated |
| − | |[[Liberal]] haters play [[conservative]]s in an [[HBO]] film about [[Sarah Palin]]. Many debunked controversies are highlighted in the plot. Both [[John McCain|McCain]] and Palin denounced the film and called it fiction. | + | |[[Liberal]] haters play [[conservative]]s in an [[HBO]] film about [[Sarah Palin]]. Many debunked controversies are highlighted in the plot. Both [[John McCain]] and Palin denounced the film, and called it fiction. |
| | |NA - TV | | |NA - TV |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 245: |
Line 239: |
| | |2011 | | |2011 |
| | |R | | |R |
| − | |Despite its name the movie is a rip-off of the conservative film ''Falling Down'', this "comedy" has a miserable man and his foul-mouthed [[nihilist]] girl sidekick summary executes [[Tea Party]] members, a Fox News like-host, Christians, and other conservative stereotypes. | + | |Despite its name, the movie is a rip-off of the conservative film ''Falling Down''. This "comedy" has a miserable man and his foul-mouthed [[nihilist]] girl sidekick summary execute [[Tea Party]] members, a [[Fox News]]-like host, Christians, and other conservative stereotypes. |
| | |$123,000 | | |$123,000 |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 263: |
Line 257: |
| | |1980 | | |1980 |
| | |R | | |R |
| − | |This notorious box office bomb comes from Marxist filmmaker Michael Cimino portrays America as the villain in the Johnson County War and has an anti-capitalist rhetoric and features a pro-illegal immigration message. Furthermore, it glamorizes prostitution and adultery. | + | |This notorious box office bomb comes from Marxist filmmaker Michael Cimino portrays America as the villain in the Johnson County War, has an anti-capitalist rhetoric, and features a pro-illegal immigration message. Furthermore, it glamorizes [[sexual immorality|prostitution and adultery]]. |
| | | | | | |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 274: |
Line 268: |
| | |''The Hunt'' | | |''The Hunt'' |
| | |2020 | | |2020 |
| − | |TBA | + | |R |
| − | |Upcoming thriller film, based in part on the 1924 short story ''The Most Dangerous Game'' but given a modern political twist, focusing on conservatives from different walks of life being rounded up and hunted for sport by rich elitist liberals. Wikipedia claims in its article about the movie that it is "satire" and, in the article, stated that the movie drew criticism from members of the conservative media as an "alleged" portrayal of liberals hunting supporters of Donald Trump (with the term "alleged" inserted in the article in an attempt to brush off and dismiss said criticism), but it is simply Hollywood elites engaging in thinking out loud about what they wish to do to those who don't agree with or support their leftist political/social groupthink. The movie drew high-profile criticism from none other than President Trump, who used it to criticize Hollywood for its racism, hatred and promotion of violence in the media, which it then uses inflammatorily to blame others and create chaos,<ref>[https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2019/08/09/donald-trump-thunders-against-racist-hollywood-they-create-violence-then-try-to-blame-others/ Donald Trump Thunders Against Racist Hollywood: "They Create Violence, Then Try to Blame Others"] at Breitbart News Network</ref> while conservative author [[David Horowitz]] called for the movie not to be released, stating that it may serve only to incite easily-influenced leftists to commit violence.<ref>[https://www.newsmax.com/newsmax-tv/david-horowitz-racism-the-hunt-liberal/2019/08/08/id/927939/ David Horowitz to Newsmax TV: Left Seeks to 'Exterminate'] at Newsmax</ref> The movie was subsequently withdrawn from release by distributor Universal Pictures in the wake of the recent mass shootings in [[El Paso Walmart shooting|El Paso]] and [[Dayton nightclub shooting|Dayton]].<ref>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XcJGfYiUDDE Universal Studios pulls the movie ''The Hunt''] at Fox News YouTube channel</ref> It was eventually recut, with the trailers making clear that the rich elitist liberals are intended to be the villains.<ref>https://www.oneangrygamer.net/2020/02/the-hunt-returns-with-a-trailer-making-it-known-liberal-elites-are-the-bad-guys/102988/</ref> | + | |Based in part on the 1924 short story ''The Most Dangerous Game'' but given a modern political twist, focusing on conservatives from different walks of life being rounded up and hunted for sport by rich elitist liberals. Wikipedia claims in its article about the movie that it is "satire" and, in the article, stated that the movie drew criticism from members of the conservative media as an "alleged" portrayal of liberals hunting supporters of Donald Trump (with the term "alleged" inserted in the article in an attempt to brush off and dismiss said criticism), but it is simply Hollywood elites engaging in thinking out loud about what they wish to do to those who don't agree with or support their leftist political/social groupthink. The movie drew high-profile criticism from none other than President Trump, who used it to criticize Hollywood for its racism, hatred and promotion of violence in the media, which it then uses inflammatorily to blame others and create chaos,<ref>[https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2019/08/09/donald-trump-thunders-against-racist-hollywood-they-create-violence-then-try-to-blame-others/ Donald Trump Thunders Against Racist Hollywood: "They Create Violence, Then Try to Blame Others"] at Breitbart News Network</ref> while conservative author [[David Horowitz]] called for the movie not to be released, stating that it may serve only to incite easily-influenced leftists to commit violence.<ref>[https://www.newsmax.com/newsmax-tv/david-horowitz-racism-the-hunt-liberal/2019/08/08/id/927939/ David Horowitz to Newsmax TV: Left Seeks to 'Exterminate'] at Newsmax</ref> The movie was subsequently withdrawn from release by distributor Universal Pictures in the wake of the recent mass shootings in [[El Paso Walmart shooting|El Paso]] and [[Dayton nightclub shooting|Dayton]].<ref>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XcJGfYiUDDE Universal Studios pulls the movie ''The Hunt''] at Fox News YouTube channel</ref> It was eventually recut, with the trailers making clear that the rich elitist liberals are intended to be the villains<ref>https://www.oneangrygamer.net/2020/02/the-hunt-returns-with-a-trailer-making-it-known-liberal-elites-are-the-bad-guys/102988/</ref>. |
| − | |TBA | + | |$5,812,500 |
| | |- | | |- |
| | |''I, Tonya'' | | |''I, Tonya'' |
| | |2017 | | |2017 |
| | |R | | |R |
| − | |History revisionist film that paints criminal Tonya Harding as a victim, reframing the narrative around her implication in the crime of attacking Nancy Kerrigan as justfied.<ref>https://amp.usatoday.com/amp/971183001</ref><ref>https://www.oregonlive.com/trending/2018/01/i_nauseated_the_oregonians_for.html</ref> There's also an anti-family theme as well as Harding's mother is protarayed as psycholically abusive, despite the fact that she was nothing like that in real life.<ref>https://people.com/movies/tonya-harding-mother-monster-friend/</ref> | + | |History revisionist film that paints criminal Tonya Harding as a victim, reframing the narrative around her implication in the crime of attacking Nancy Kerrigan as justified<ref>https://amp.usatoday.com/amp/971183001</ref><ref>https://www.oregonlive.com/trending/2018/01/i_nauseated_the_oregonians_for.html</ref>. There's also an anti-family theme, as Harding's mother is falsely portrayed as psychologically abusive, despite the fact that she was nothing like that in real life<ref>https://people.com/movies/tonya-harding-mother-monster-friend/</ref>. |
| | |$53 million | | |$53 million |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 287: |
Line 281: |
| | |2016 | | |2016 |
| | |R | | |R |
| − | |Although it is the sequel to the patriotic and to a certain extent conservative film ''Independence Day'', it does not at all reference the concepts of patriotism, American exceptionalism, or even national sovereignty. Instead, most of the movie seems to support globalism, and Doctor Okun is revealed to be a homosexual despite such never being implied in the original film. Forced multicultural elements are present as well. | + | |Although it is the sequel to the patriotic and, to a certain extent, conservative film ''Independence Day'', it does not at all reference the concepts of patriotism, American exceptionalism, or even national sovereignty. Instead, most of the movie seems to support globalism, and Doctor Okun is revealed to be a homosexual despite such never being implied in the original film. Forced [[multicultural]] elements are present as well. |
| | |$389.7 million | | |$389.7 million |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 293: |
Line 287: |
| | |1991 | | |1991 |
| | |R | | |R |
| − | |This historically inaccurate account on President John F. Kennedy's assassination serves liberal filmmaker Oliver Stone's insanely fanatic conspiracy theories. For example, the filmmaker pinpoints the blame to the "real murder" of Kennedy: the conservative politicians, the U.S. Military, and then-Vice President Lyndon B. Johnson, all of whom want America to go to war in Vietnam because Kennedy rejected the American involvement. Stone described the film as a "counter-myth" to the Warren Commission's "fictional myth." | + | |This historically inaccurate account on [[President John F. Kennedy]]'s assassination serves liberal filmmaker Oliver Stone's insanely fanatic conspiracy theories. For example, the filmmaker pinpoints the blame to the "real murder" of Kennedy: the conservative politicians, the U.S. Military, and then-Vice President Lyndon B. Johnson, all of whom want America to go to war in Vietnam because Kennedy rejected the American involvement. Stone described the film as a "counter-myth" to the Warren Commission's "fictional myth." |
| | |$70,405,498 | | |$70,405,498 |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 299: |
Line 293: |
| | |2002 | | |2002 |
| | |PG-13 | | |PG-13 |
| − | |This laughably inaccurate portrayal of the American healthcare system depicts private healthcare executives as heartless and uses manipulative melodrama to promote socialized medicine. It also attacks the second amendment. | + | |This laughably inaccurate portrayal of the American healthcare system depicts private healthcare executives as heartless, and uses manipulative melodrama to promote socialized medicine. It also attacks the second amendment. |
| | |- | | |- |
| | |''Lolita'' (1997 film) | | |''Lolita'' (1997 film) |
| Line 310: |
Line 304: |
| | |2013 | | |2013 |
| | |PG-13 | | |PG-13 |
| − | |This attack on [[capitalist]]s and the [[military]] portrays the former as ruthless, greedy railroad executives and the latter as "thugs" who support their actions. It distorts the messages of its source material by displaying the [[Lone Ranger]], shown to be a smart intellectual character in the original TV and radio serials, as dumbfounded and unintelligent, instead featuring his sidekick [[Tonto]] (played by [[liberal]] [[marijuana|pot]]-smoker [[Johnny Depp]]) not only as the "star" of the film but as the Lone Ranger's "voice of reason", too. | + | |This attack on [[capitalist]]s and the [[military]] portrays the former as ruthless, greedy railroad executives and the latter as "thugs" who support their actions. It distorts the messages of its source material by displaying the [[Lone Ranger]], shown to be a smart intellectual character in the original TV and radio serials, as dumbfounded and unintelligent, instead featuring his sidekick [[Tonto]] (played by [[liberal]] [[marijuana|pot-smoker]] [[Johnny Depp]]) not only as the "star" of the film, but as the Lone Ranger's "voice of reason", too. |
| | |$89,302,115 | | |$89,302,115 |
| | |- | | |- |