nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 51:
Line 51: + + + + + + + +
Cypam's edit
[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 20:16, 11 May 2007 (EDT)
[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 20:16, 11 May 2007 (EDT)
== Cypam's edit ==
Cypam's last edit comprises three components:
# Insertion of a claim that not all creationist accept baraminology. His reference supports that not all creationists are Christian (which is not disputed), bot not that not all creationists accept baraminology. And that is a claim that is not explicitly made in the article anyway.
# Reinstatement of Aengus2's twice-previously-reverted claim of what some critics might claim plus a dogmatic statement that baraminologists are wrong. It has previously been reverted on the grounds of being an "uncited claim which fails to recognise the arguments". It is still uncited, and still misses the point (by being dogmatic), and any editor who reinserts it in this fashion (uncited and dogmatically) will earn themselves a block.
# An obtuse paragraph that is clearly designed to parody the alleged difficulty of baraminology by being difficult itself. It is making an uncited opinion about baraminology in a way that is deliberately obtuse, and has been reverted three times by two different sysops. Reinstatement of it without approval (which will not be forthcoming without a compelling case being made) will also be grounds for a block.
:[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 23:28, 29 May 2007 (EDT)