SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
2,401
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 51:
Line 51: + +
Doctored photo in the article
:Ok, we'll get our crack team of reviewers on it right away. Should have the investigation complete in a couple years. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]]</sup> 16:32, January 13, 2022 (EST)
:Ok, we'll get our crack team of reviewers on it right away. Should have the investigation complete in a couple years. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]]</sup> 16:32, January 13, 2022 (EST)
::This is not a joke, RobS. We have an article which is using a doctored photo as "evidence" to push an absurd claim that a specific individual is secretly transgender. Not only that, that same article is even citing a source which both (1) blatantly ''states'' that the photo is doctored, and (2) provides hard evidence to prove its counterclaim.
::I don't know about you, but that seems pretty hard to refute. Of course you can go ahead and try if you'd like. Please feel free to state why you think the version of the photo seen in the article is not doctored.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 18:10, January 13, 2022 (EST)