3
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 5:
Line 5: + +
→General information
The articles themselves contain little factual content and mostly consist of poorly-explained subjective opinions (which have little to do on an encyclopedia){{Fact}} and "jokes" of questionable quality—the presence of which is often explained in the beginning of the article. Quite often, the articles just refer to [[Wikipedia]] or another wiki for factual information. However, Liberapedia is so far-left that they consider Wikipedia to be biased to the ''right'',<ref>https://liberapedia.wikia.org/wiki/Wikipedia</ref> and Liberapedia openly describes itself as, "Your source for [[Liberal]] ideas, [[social democrat|Social Democrat]] and [[Socialist]] viewpoints," as opposed to Wikipedia and to an extent RationalWiki, where this bias is more implicit.
The articles themselves contain little factual content and mostly consist of poorly-explained subjective opinions (which have little to do on an encyclopedia){{Fact}} and "jokes" of questionable quality—the presence of which is often explained in the beginning of the article. Quite often, the articles just refer to [[Wikipedia]] or another wiki for factual information. However, Liberapedia is so far-left that they consider Wikipedia to be biased to the ''right'',<ref>https://liberapedia.wikia.org/wiki/Wikipedia</ref> and Liberapedia openly describes itself as, "Your source for [[Liberal]] ideas, [[social democrat|Social Democrat]] and [[Socialist]] viewpoints," as opposed to Wikipedia and to an extent RationalWiki, where this bias is more implicit.
The concept of a "Liberapedia" it redundant, since Wikipedia is already the left-leaning biased counterpart to Conservapedia.
==Liberapedia on Conservapedia==
==Liberapedia on Conservapedia==