Changes

The articles themselves contain little factual content and mostly consist of poorly-explained subjective opinions (which have little to do on an encyclopedia){{Fact}} and "jokes" of questionable quality—the presence of which is often explained in the beginning of the article. Quite often, the articles just refer to [[Wikipedia]] or another wiki for factual information. However, Liberapedia is so far-left that they consider Wikipedia to be biased to the ''right'',<ref>https://liberapedia.wikia.org/wiki/Wikipedia</ref> and Liberapedia openly describes itself as, "Your source for [[Liberal]] ideas, [[social democrat|Social Democrat]] and [[Socialist]] viewpoints," as opposed to Wikipedia and to an extent RationalWiki, where this bias is more implicit.

The articles themselves contain little factual content and mostly consist of poorly-explained subjective opinions (which have little to do on an encyclopedia){{Fact}} and "jokes" of questionable quality—the presence of which is often explained in the beginning of the article. Quite often, the articles just refer to [[Wikipedia]] or another wiki for factual information. However, Liberapedia is so far-left that they consider Wikipedia to be biased to the ''right'',<ref>https://liberapedia.wikia.org/wiki/Wikipedia</ref> and Liberapedia openly describes itself as, "Your source for [[Liberal]] ideas, [[social democrat|Social Democrat]] and [[Socialist]] viewpoints," as opposed to Wikipedia and to an extent RationalWiki, where this bias is more implicit.

The concept of a "Liberapedia" it redundant, since Wikipedia is already the left-leaning biased counterpart to Conservapedia.

The concept of a "Liberapedia" is redundant, since Wikipedia is already the left-leaning biased counterpart to Conservapedia.

==Liberapedia on Conservapedia==

==Liberapedia on Conservapedia==

"Conservapedia sucks because they have stupid fundy religious ideas and right-wing crap. They hate everything that is in the left-wing spectrum, and they think that they are trust-worthy."  

"Conservapedia sucks because they have stupid fundy religious ideas and right-wing crap. They hate everything that is in the left-wing spectrum, and they think that they are trust-worthy."  

==Liberapedia on liberals==

==Liberapedia on liberals==

Liberapedia has referred to itself as quote "a thriving source of the truth on the internet" while giving no information on why it is the "truth".

Liberapedia has referred to itself as quote "a thriving source of the truth on the internet" while giving no information on why it is the "truth".

"Liberal men are by far better in bed and tend to be in better physical, mental, social, psychological, and spiritual health than conservative men. In contrast, conservative men tend to be obese, inhibited, abusive, and they'd rather view porn than please their wives." They provide no evidence of this, and this information can be contradicted very easily as well as exposed for what it is, liberal [[projection]].

"Liberal men are by far better in bed and tend to be in better physical, mental, social, psychological, and spiritual health than conservative men. In contrast, conservative men tend to be obese, inhibited, abusive, and they'd rather view porn than please their wives." They provide no evidence of this, and this information can be contradicted very easily as well as exposed for what it is, liberal [[projection]].and

==External links==

==External links==