Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
1 byte added ,  19:53, April 23, 2022
Line 280: Line 280:  
:The page is now locked due to excessive edit warring. Please do not ignore Admin warnings. Any changes need to be discussed here on talk, first. Adding links to the CDC, as if the CDC is definitive science, is ineffective and must include warnings in text. Thank you. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]]</sup> 17:22, March 31, 2022 (EDT)  
 
:The page is now locked due to excessive edit warring. Please do not ignore Admin warnings. Any changes need to be discussed here on talk, first. Adding links to the CDC, as if the CDC is definitive science, is ineffective and must include warnings in text. Thank you. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]]</sup> 17:22, March 31, 2022 (EDT)  
 
:Can a source be added for the following controversial statement in the lede? "Many vaccines, including the Covid vaccines, are based on aborted fetal tissue, apparently as a way to try to increase public acceptance of abortion".  In fact this statement should be removed as there is no discussion of this issue in the body of the article.--[[User:Jackin the box|Jackin the box]] ([[User talk:Jackin the box|talk]]) 11:04, April 23, 2022 (EDT)
 
:Can a source be added for the following controversial statement in the lede? "Many vaccines, including the Covid vaccines, are based on aborted fetal tissue, apparently as a way to try to increase public acceptance of abortion".  In fact this statement should be removed as there is no discussion of this issue in the body of the article.--[[User:Jackin the box|Jackin the box]] ([[User talk:Jackin the box|talk]]) 11:04, April 23, 2022 (EDT)
:Yah, maybe in 75 years when the [[covid coverup]] is resolved. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]]</sup> 15:52, April 23, 2022 (EDT)
+
::Yah, maybe in 75 years when the [[covid coverup]] is resolved. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]]</sup> 15:52, April 23, 2022 (EDT)
    
== Non-mRNAm, traditional viral vector covid vaccines  ==
 
== Non-mRNAm, traditional viral vector covid vaccines  ==
    
While I can understand that some are fearful of all vaccines, and others of just suspicious of [[mRNA]] COVID-19 Vaccines, I do not understand why '''non-mRNAm, traditional viral vector covid vaccines''' are not covered here. It would seem that Conservapedia recognizes the value of non-controversial vaccines in saving lives. --[[User:Jackin the box|Jackin the box]] ([[User talk:Jackin the box|talk]]) 15:37, April 12, 2022 (EDT)
 
While I can understand that some are fearful of all vaccines, and others of just suspicious of [[mRNA]] COVID-19 Vaccines, I do not understand why '''non-mRNAm, traditional viral vector covid vaccines''' are not covered here. It would seem that Conservapedia recognizes the value of non-controversial vaccines in saving lives. --[[User:Jackin the box|Jackin the box]] ([[User talk:Jackin the box|talk]]) 15:37, April 12, 2022 (EDT)
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
292,404

edits

Navigation menu