SkipCaptcha
906
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 281:
Line 281: +
→Comments: Vaccines plural
:Can a source be added for the following controversial statement in the lede? "Many vaccines, including the Covid vaccines, are based on aborted fetal tissue, apparently as a way to try to increase public acceptance of abortion". In fact this statement should be removed as there is no discussion of this issue in the body of the article.--[[User:Jackin the box|Jackin the box]] ([[User talk:Jackin the box|talk]]) 11:04, April 23, 2022 (EDT)
:Can a source be added for the following controversial statement in the lede? "Many vaccines, including the Covid vaccines, are based on aborted fetal tissue, apparently as a way to try to increase public acceptance of abortion". In fact this statement should be removed as there is no discussion of this issue in the body of the article.--[[User:Jackin the box|Jackin the box]] ([[User talk:Jackin the box|talk]]) 11:04, April 23, 2022 (EDT)
::Yah, maybe in 75 years when the [[covid coverup]] is resolved. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]]</sup> 15:52, April 23, 2022 (EDT)
::Yah, maybe in 75 years when the [[covid coverup]] is resolved. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]]</sup> 15:52, April 23, 2022 (EDT)
Not about covid. --[[User:Jackin the box|Jackin the box]] ([[User talk:Jackin the box|talk]]) 18:04, April 23, 2022 (EDT)
== Non-mRNAm, traditional viral vector covid vaccines ==
== Non-mRNAm, traditional viral vector covid vaccines ==
While I can understand that some are fearful of all vaccines, and others of just suspicious of [[mRNA]] COVID-19 Vaccines, I do not understand why '''non-mRNAm, traditional viral vector covid vaccines''' are not covered here. It would seem that Conservapedia recognizes the value of non-controversial vaccines in saving lives. --[[User:Jackin the box|Jackin the box]] ([[User talk:Jackin the box|talk]]) 15:37, April 12, 2022 (EDT)
While I can understand that some are fearful of all vaccines, and others of just suspicious of [[mRNA]] COVID-19 Vaccines, I do not understand why '''non-mRNAm, traditional viral vector covid vaccines''' are not covered here. It would seem that Conservapedia recognizes the value of non-controversial vaccines in saving lives. --[[User:Jackin the box|Jackin the box]] ([[User talk:Jackin the box|talk]]) 15:37, April 12, 2022 (EDT)