Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
11 bytes removed ,  17:50, April 28, 2022
m
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:  
'''The Club for Growth''', nicknamed "Club for [[Chinese]] Growth" because of its support for phony [[free trade]] at the expense of [[American]] jobs, is a [[libertarian]]-leaning [[economic]] group funded by wealthy donors.  The organization has been known for endorsing and funding fiscally [[conservative]] candidates over moderates and [[Democrats]].  Club for Growth’s political action committee has been heavily involved in funding candidates who favor lowering taxes, and sometimes against [[Trump]]-endorsed "America First" candidates.
 
'''The Club for Growth''', nicknamed "Club for [[Chinese]] Growth" because of its support for phony [[free trade]] at the expense of [[American]] jobs, is a [[libertarian]]-leaning [[economic]] group funded by wealthy donors.  The organization has been known for endorsing and funding fiscally [[conservative]] candidates over moderates and [[Democrats]].  Club for Growth’s political action committee has been heavily involved in funding candidates who favor lowering taxes, and sometimes against [[Trump]]-endorsed "America First" candidates.
   −
Club for Growth spends significant funds, often on ineffective or counterproductive negative ads, on elections.  As of April 28, 2022:
+
Club for Growth spends significant funds, often on ineffective or counterproductive negative ads, on elections:
−
{{cquote|The Club for Growth spent $71 million supporting Republican candidates in the 2020 election and has so far raised $38 million for the 2022 midterms, spending $13 million.<ref>https://www.aol.com/news/top-conservative-group-fires-back-164829211.html</ref>}}
+
{{cquote|The Club for Growth spent $71 million supporting Republican candidates in the 2020 election and [as of April 28, 2022] raised $38 million for the 2022 midterms, spending $13 million.<ref>https://www.aol.com/news/top-conservative-group-fires-back-164829211.html</ref>}}
    
Rather than fund [[grassroots]] efforts, Club for Growth spends wastefully on often-negative advertisements that probably have virtually no effect on elections.  Its negative ads against a conservative, who then wins the primary anyway, can make it harder for the conservative to win the general election.
 
Rather than fund [[grassroots]] efforts, Club for Growth spends wastefully on often-negative advertisements that probably have virtually no effect on elections.  Its negative ads against a conservative, who then wins the primary anyway, can make it harder for the conservative to win the general election.
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,204

edits

Navigation menu