Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
86 bytes added ,  17:53, April 28, 2022
m
wikify
Line 2: Line 2:     
Club for Growth spends significant funds, often on ineffective or counterproductive negative ads, on elections:
 
Club for Growth spends significant funds, often on ineffective or counterproductive negative ads, on elections:
−
{{cquote|The Club for Growth spent $71 million supporting Republican candidates in the 2020 election and [as of April 28, 2022] raised $38 million for the 2022 midterms, spending $13 million.<ref>https://www.aol.com/news/top-conservative-group-fires-back-164829211.html</ref>}}
+
{{cquote|The Club for Growth [https://www.opensecrets.org/political-action-committees-pacs/C00487470/summary/2020 spent $71 million] supporting Republican candidates in the 2020 election and [as of April 28, 2022] raised $38 million for the 2022 midterms, spending $13 million.<ref>https://www.aol.com/news/top-conservative-group-fires-back-164829211.html</ref>}}
    
Rather than fund [[grassroots]] efforts, Club for Growth spends wastefully on often-negative advertisements that probably have virtually no effect on elections.  Its negative ads against a conservative, who then wins the primary anyway, can make it harder for the conservative to win the general election.
 
Rather than fund [[grassroots]] efforts, Club for Growth spends wastefully on often-negative advertisements that probably have virtually no effect on elections.  Its negative ads against a conservative, who then wins the primary anyway, can make it harder for the conservative to win the general election.
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,204

edits

Navigation menu