SkipCaptcha
906
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 101:
Line 101: + + + + +
→Notability: Further thought is needed here.
::Suggestion: Divide the ==Women in History== into subgroups and figure out an average number to round out, and use that number for ==Contemporary figures== with X number from each of the historic subgroups. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Z]]</sup> 19:31, May 20, 2022 (EDT)
::Suggestion: Divide the ==Women in History== into subgroups and figure out an average number to round out, and use that number for ==Contemporary figures== with X number from each of the historic subgroups. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Z]]</sup> 19:31, May 20, 2022 (EDT)
::We may need a ===Women in business=== or ===Social activist=== subhead, too. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Z]]</sup> 19:38, May 20, 2022 (EDT)
::We may need a ===Women in business=== or ===Social activist=== subhead, too. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Z]]</sup> 19:38, May 20, 2022 (EDT)
:::Maybe a new article/section on famous contemporary women might be a good idea. Women in history implies that the person is of historical importance. Thus, being a woman premier or even president isn’t sufficient, because there have been several dozens such women. Also, maybe there should be a separate article/section on Nobel prize winners? Again there are too many of them to include. Who to include requires more thought. Several additions that I made should, on further thought, probably be deleted. I looked for a comparable Conservapedia article on men, but couldn't find one. I found this resource online: [https://www.historyextra.com/100-women/100-women-results/ "100 Women Who Changed the World"] . --[[User:Jackin the box|Jackin the box]] ([[User talk:Jackin the box|talk]]) 09:36, May 21, 2022 (EDT)
===refs===
===refs===
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}