Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
293,563
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 104:
Line 104: +
→Notability
:::Maybe a new article/section on famous contemporary women might be a good idea. Women in history implies that the person is of historical importance. Thus, being a woman premier or even president isn’t sufficient, because there have been several dozens such women. Also, maybe there should be a separate article/section on Nobel prize winners? Again there are too many of them to include. Who to include requires more thought. Several additions that I made should, on further thought, probably be deleted. I looked for a comparable Conservapedia article on men, but couldn't find one. I found this resource online: [https://www.historyextra.com/100-women/100-women-results/ "100 Women Who Changed the World"] . --[[User:Jackin the box|Jackin the box]] ([[User talk:Jackin the box|talk]]) 09:36, May 21, 2022 (EDT)
:::Maybe a new article/section on famous contemporary women might be a good idea. Women in history implies that the person is of historical importance. Thus, being a woman premier or even president isn’t sufficient, because there have been several dozens such women. Also, maybe there should be a separate article/section on Nobel prize winners? Again there are too many of them to include. Who to include requires more thought. Several additions that I made should, on further thought, probably be deleted. I looked for a comparable Conservapedia article on men, but couldn't find one. I found this resource online: [https://www.historyextra.com/100-women/100-women-results/ "100 Women Who Changed the World"] . --[[User:Jackin the box|Jackin the box]] ([[User talk:Jackin the box|talk]]) 09:36, May 21, 2022 (EDT)
::::Keep in mind our target readership, which would be basically school aged girls. It's meant to be inspirational. A separate article on Nobel winners sounds like an excellent idea. A separate page on contemporary women would be a nightmare to maintain. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Z]]</sup> 14:31, May 21, 2022 (EDT)
===refs===
===refs===
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}