Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
293,563
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 107:
Line 107: + +
→Notability
:::Interesting that you put Rachel Carsen in Politics and not Science. Can we call this the [[Politicization of science]], and how deeply ingrained it is? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Z]]</sup> 16:26, May 22, 2022 (EDT)
:::Interesting that you put Rachel Carsen in Politics and not Science. Can we call this the [[Politicization of science]], and how deeply ingrained it is? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Z]]</sup> 16:26, May 22, 2022 (EDT)
:::And why would Phyllis Schlafly be in Religion and not Politics? Sure, she never held elected office or an appointed position in government, but Schlafly & Carsen could easily go into a ==Social activism== subhead since Carsen, presumably was lacking in scientific credentials. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Z]]</sup> 16:36, May 22, 2022 (EDT)
===refs===
===refs===
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}