Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
293,563
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 109:
Line 109: + + +
→Notability
:::And why would Phyllis Schlafly be in Religion and not Politics? Sure, she never held elected office or an appointed position in government, but Schlafly & Carsen could easily go into a ==Social activism== subhead since Carsen, presumably was lacking in scientific credentials. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Z]]</sup> 16:36, May 22, 2022 (EDT)
:::And why would Phyllis Schlafly be in Religion and not Politics? Sure, she never held elected office or an appointed position in government, but Schlafly & Carsen could easily go into a ==Social activism== subhead since Carsen, presumably was lacking in scientific credentials. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Z]]</sup> 16:36, May 22, 2022 (EDT)
==Amelia Earhart, really?==
Amelia Earhart, the most celebrated of all women aviator. Yah, that how the liberal media sold her when she took off for her much-publicized trip around the world....until she crashed and burned in the South Pacific. Other say she was eaten by cannibals. Some say the Japanese executed her. But she never made it around the world. [[Hanna Reitsch]] had more "celebrated" accomplishments as an aviator in that period. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Ich bin ein breakfast taco]]</sup> 22:38, August 28, 2022 (EDT)
===refs===
===refs===
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}