The "Sí" option would have probably won if the election was in 1987, but the majority verdict changed due to the enormous flow of money from the U.S. National Endowment for Democracy and the millionaire European subsidies for a majority of anti-government print media that subsisted thanks to the prevailing freedom of the press (although each year the Inter-American Press Association maintained that there was none, which wasn't true due to the existing opposition magazines containing the worst criticisms to the military government).<ref>{{cite web|url=https://blogdehermogenes.blogspot.com/2018/10/hoy-votaria-si-con-mayor-razon.html|title=Hoy Votaría "Sí" Con Mayor Razón|date=October 3, 2018|language=es|publisher=[[Hermógenes Pérez de Arce]]'s blog}}</ref> | The "Sí" option would have probably won if the election was in 1987, but the majority verdict changed due to the enormous flow of money from the U.S. National Endowment for Democracy and the millionaire European subsidies for a majority of anti-government print media that subsisted thanks to the prevailing freedom of the press (although each year the Inter-American Press Association maintained that there was none, which wasn't true due to the existing opposition magazines containing the worst criticisms to the military government).<ref>{{cite web|url=https://blogdehermogenes.blogspot.com/2018/10/hoy-votaria-si-con-mayor-razon.html|title=Hoy Votaría "Sí" Con Mayor Razón|date=October 3, 2018|language=es|publisher=[[Hermógenes Pérez de Arce]]'s blog}}</ref> |