Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:  
==International interference==
 
==International interference==
 
{{Main article|National Endowment for Democracy}}
 
{{Main article|National Endowment for Democracy}}
−
The "No" Campaign and the Concertación were supported by [[George Soros]] and the [[National Endowment for Democracy]] which helped the center-left with propaganda on television, newspapers, radio and magazines.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://blogdehermogenes.blogspot.com/2020/12/se-me-cayeron-los-estados-unidos.html|title="Se Me Cayeron" los Estados Unidos|date=December 30, 2020|language=es|publisher=[[Hermógenes Pérez de Arce]]'s blog}}</ref><ref name=aniversarioSi>{{cite web|url=https://blogdehermogenes.blogspot.com/2018/09/otro-aniversario-del-si.html|title=Otro Aniversario del "Sí"|date=Septemebr 30, 2020|language=es|publisher=[[Hermógenes Pérez de Arce]]'s blog}}</ref> Soros is a friend of the Chilean politician Máximo Pacheco who thanked the him for "his contribution in the recovery of our democracy, and we do not forget that in Chile" and also said that Soros was crusial "in conducting studies and obtaining data that gave us information that had been hidden from us for 17 years." "What we learned there was crucial for the preparation of the famous television program of the No campaign and for the victory in the plebiscite".<ref>[https://www.emol.com/noticias/Economia/2015/09/27/751793/El-multimillonario-que-apoyo-al-NO.html Soros helped the "No" campaign]</ref>
+
The "No" Campaign and the Concertación were supported by [[George Soros]]<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.economiaynegocios.cl/noticias/noticias.asp?id=186894|title=Ministro desclasifica vínculo de George Soros con Chile: apoyó campaña del No, ayudó a Ricardo Lagos con los empresarios y hoy respalda inversión en el país|language=es|publisher=Economía y Negocios|date=September 27 2015}}</ref> and the [[National Endowment for Democracy]] which helped the center-left with propaganda on television, newspapers, radio and magazines.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://blogdehermogenes.blogspot.com/2020/12/se-me-cayeron-los-estados-unidos.html|title="Se Me Cayeron" los Estados Unidos|date=December 30, 2020|language=es|publisher=[[Hermógenes Pérez de Arce]]'s blog}}</ref><ref name=aniversarioSi>{{cite web|url=https://blogdehermogenes.blogspot.com/2018/09/otro-aniversario-del-si.html|title=Otro Aniversario del "Sí"|date=Septemebr 30, 2020|language=es|publisher=[[Hermógenes Pérez de Arce]]'s blog}}</ref> Soros is a friend of the Chilean politician Máximo Pacheco who thanked the him for "his contribution in the recovery of our democracy, and we do not forget that in Chile" and also said that Soros was crusial "in conducting studies and obtaining data that gave us information that had been hidden from us for 17 years." "What we learned there was crucial for the preparation of the famous television program of the No campaign and for the victory in the plebiscite".<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.emol.com/noticias/Economia/2015/09/27/751793/El-multimillonario-que-apoyo-al-NO.html|title=El multimillonario que apoyó la campaña del No y ayudó a Ricardo Lagos con empresarios (Soros helped the "No" campaign)|publisher=Emol|language=es|date=September 27 2015}}</ref>
    
The "Sí" option would have probably won if the election was in 1987, but the majority verdict changed due to the enormous flow of money from the U.S. National Endowment for Democracy and the millionaire European subsidies for a majority of anti-government print media that subsisted thanks to the prevailing freedom of the press (although each year the Inter-American Press Association maintained that there was none, which wasn't true due to the existing opposition magazines containing the worst criticisms to the military government).<ref>{{cite web|url=https://blogdehermogenes.blogspot.com/2018/10/hoy-votaria-si-con-mayor-razon.html|title=Hoy Votaría "Sí" Con Mayor Razón|date=October 3, 2018|language=es|publisher=[[Hermógenes Pérez de Arce]]'s blog}}</ref>
 
The "Sí" option would have probably won if the election was in 1987, but the majority verdict changed due to the enormous flow of money from the U.S. National Endowment for Democracy and the millionaire European subsidies for a majority of anti-government print media that subsisted thanks to the prevailing freedom of the press (although each year the Inter-American Press Association maintained that there was none, which wasn't true due to the existing opposition magazines containing the worst criticisms to the military government).<ref>{{cite web|url=https://blogdehermogenes.blogspot.com/2018/10/hoy-votaria-si-con-mayor-razon.html|title=Hoy Votaría "Sí" Con Mayor Razón|date=October 3, 2018|language=es|publisher=[[Hermógenes Pérez de Arce]]'s blog}}</ref>
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit, protect
4,562

edits

Navigation menu