Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Sherman Antitrust Act (view source)

Revision as of 05:57, July 11, 2022

736 bytes added ,  05:57, July 11, 2022
→‎Section Two
Line 27: Line 27:     
To prevail under another type of Section Two claim, "Both the possession of monopoly power and its willful misuse are necessary to sustain a charge of illegal monopolization under Section 2 of the Sherman Act."  ''United States v. S. Motor Carriers Rate Conference, Inc.'', 672 F.2d 469, 484 (5th Cir. 1982).
 
To prevail under another type of Section Two claim, "Both the possession of monopoly power and its willful misuse are necessary to sustain a charge of illegal monopolization under Section 2 of the Sherman Act."  ''United States v. S. Motor Carriers Rate Conference, Inc.'', 672 F.2d 469, 484 (5th Cir. 1982).
 +
 +
In the [[Fifth Circuit]], the elements of wrongful monopolization are:
 +
{{cquote|Section 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act not only prohibits the abuse of monopoly power but also any "attempt to monopolize ... any part of the trade or commerce among the several States." 15 U.S.C. § 2. To prevail on an attempted monopolization claim, a plaintiff must show: "(1) that the defendant has engaged in predatory or anticompetitive conduct with (2) a specific intent to monopolize and (3) a dangerous probability of achieving monopoly power." ''Spectrum Sports, Inc. v. McQuillan'', 506 U.S. 447, 456, 113 S. Ct. 884, 890-91, 122 L. Ed. 2d 247 (1993).}}
 +
''Retractable Techs., Inc. v. Becton Dickinson & Co.'', 842 F.3d 883, 891 (5th Cir. 2016)
    
=== Sherman Section Two precedents ===
 
=== Sherman Section Two precedents ===
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,445

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/1871905"

Navigation menu