Changes

In the [[Fifth Circuit]], the elements of wrongful monopolization are:

In the [[Fifth Circuit]], the elements of wrongful monopolization are:

{{cquote|Section 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act not only prohibits the abuse of monopoly power but also any "attempt to monopolize ... any part of the trade or commerce among the several States." 15 U.S.C. § 2. To prevail on an attempted monopolization claim, a plaintiff must show: "(1) that the defendant has engaged in predatory or anticompetitive conduct with (2) a specific intent to monopolize and (3) a dangerous probability of achieving monopoly power." ''Spectrum Sports, Inc. v. McQuillan'', 506 U.S. 447, 456, 113 S. Ct. 884, 890-91, 122 L. Ed. 2d 247 (1993).}}

{{cquote|Section 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act not only prohibits the abuse of monopoly power but also any "attempt to monopolize ... any part of the trade or commerce among the several States." 15 U.S.C. § 2. To prevail on an attempted monopolization claim, a plaintiff must show: "(1) that the defendant has engaged in predatory or anticompetitive conduct with (2) a specific intent to monopolize and (3) a dangerous probability of achieving monopoly power." ''Spectrum Sports, Inc. v. McQuillan'', 506 U.S. 447, 456, 113 S. Ct. 884, 890-91, 122 L. Ed. 2d 247 (1993).}}

''Retractable Techs., Inc. v. Becton Dickinson & Co.'', 842 F.3d 883, 891 (5th Cir. 2016)

''Retractable Techs., Inc. v. Becton Dickinson & Co.'', 842 F.3d 883, 891 (5th Cir. 2016).

=== Sherman Section Two precedents ===

=== Sherman Section Two precedents ===