Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1: −
'''Cafeteria Christianity''' is a non-scriptural colloquialism that refers to the practice of deciding for oneself which parts of the [[Bible]] to accept, as one might select certain foods in a cafeteria while rejecting others.<ref>[http://www.churchofgoddfw.com/monthly/cafeteria.html "Cafeteria Christianity," from the Church of God - DFW]</ref> This implies that the person is a [[Christian In Name Only|Christian in name only]] and, while believing in a deity, does not adhere to scripture. Other terms include "salad-bar Christianity" and "[[cherry picking|cherry-picking]] Christianity." Cafeteria Christianity is an example of self-generated Christianity, i.e., "Christianity" developed to meet one's own demand profile.<ref>{{cite book| first1=Robert |last1=Ekelund |authorlink1= Robert Ekelund |first2= Robert |last2= Hébert |first3= Robert |last3=Tollison |authorlink3= Robert Tollison |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=FP08EXnwP3YC&lpg=PA334&dq=cafeteria%20Christianity&pg=PA258#v=onepage&q=cafeteria%20Christianity&f=false |title=The Marketplace of Christianity |publisher= MIT Press |year= 2006 |page = 258 |isbn=9780262050821 }}</ref> It is a form of [[confirmation bias]].
+
'''Cafeteria Christianity''' is a non-scriptural colloquialism that refers to the practice of deciding for oneself which parts of the [[Bible]] to accept, as one might select certain foods in a cafeteria while rejecting others, as opposed to a [[Methuselah|Methuselized decision]] to accept what is in front of them.<ref>[http://www.churchofgoddfw.com/monthly/cafeteria.html "Cafeteria Christianity," from the Church of God - DFW]</ref> This implies that the person is a [[Christian In Name Only|Christian in name only]] and, while believing in a deity, does not adhere to scripture. Other terms include "salad-bar Christianity" and "[[cherry picking|cherry-picking]] Christianity." Cafeteria Christianity is an example of self-generated Christianity, i.e., "Christianity" developed to meet one's own demand profile.<ref>{{cite book| first1=Robert |last1=Ekelund |authorlink1= Robert Ekelund |first2= Robert |last2= Hébert |first3= Robert |last3=Tollison |authorlink3= Robert Tollison |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=FP08EXnwP3YC&lpg=PA334&dq=cafeteria%20Christianity&pg=PA258#v=onepage&q=cafeteria%20Christianity&f=false |title=The Marketplace of Christianity |publisher= MIT Press |year= 2006 |page = 258 |isbn=9780262050821 }}</ref> It is a form of [[confirmation bias]].
    
This practice is particularly common in order to deny the existence of [[Hell]] and the necessity of [[faith]] for redemption. Matt. 7:1, "Judge not, that ye be not judged" is sometimes quoted out of [[context]] particularly often for this purpose. When read in context, this verse is part of a condemnation of [[hypocrisy]], not judgment in general.<ref>[https://www.crosswalk.com/faith/bible-study/the-most-misused-verses-in-the-bible-excerpt.html Judging Others: A Closer Look at Matthew 7:1], from [[Crosswalk.com]]</ref> Likewise, some selectively ignore passages which refute [[evolution]], condemn [[abortion]], make statements about the role of [[women]] that refute modern [[feminism|feminist]] dogmas, condemn [[homosexuality]], [[adultery]], and [[remarriage]] after an un-Biblical [[divorce]], and conflict with other liberal views. Liberal Christians are also fond of citing Scripture selectively in order to rebuke [[Hypocrisy|only someone else's sins]] or to [[special pleading|explain away]] the sins of liberal political allies.
 
This practice is particularly common in order to deny the existence of [[Hell]] and the necessity of [[faith]] for redemption. Matt. 7:1, "Judge not, that ye be not judged" is sometimes quoted out of [[context]] particularly often for this purpose. When read in context, this verse is part of a condemnation of [[hypocrisy]], not judgment in general.<ref>[https://www.crosswalk.com/faith/bible-study/the-most-misused-verses-in-the-bible-excerpt.html Judging Others: A Closer Look at Matthew 7:1], from [[Crosswalk.com]]</ref> Likewise, some selectively ignore passages which refute [[evolution]], condemn [[abortion]], make statements about the role of [[women]] that refute modern [[feminism|feminist]] dogmas, condemn [[homosexuality]], [[adultery]], and [[remarriage]] after an un-Biblical [[divorce]], and conflict with other liberal views. Liberal Christians are also fond of citing Scripture selectively in order to rebuke [[Hypocrisy|only someone else's sins]] or to [[special pleading|explain away]] the sins of liberal political allies.
    
If Christians do not take the entire Bible seriously, unbelievers may assume that they need not do so, either. Cafeteria Christians are often referred to as "carnal Christians".  A cafeteria Christian can endanger the faith of others by spreading false doctrine as though it were genuine Christianity.<ref>[http://roblattin.hubpages.com/hub/How-To-Spot-A-Cafeteria-Christian How to Spot a Cafeteria Christian]</ref>
 
If Christians do not take the entire Bible seriously, unbelievers may assume that they need not do so, either. Cafeteria Christians are often referred to as "carnal Christians".  A cafeteria Christian can endanger the faith of others by spreading false doctrine as though it were genuine Christianity.<ref>[http://roblattin.hubpages.com/hub/How-To-Spot-A-Cafeteria-Christian How to Spot a Cafeteria Christian]</ref>
 +
 +
    
==What the Bible teaches==
 
==What the Bible teaches==
SkipCaptcha
366

edits

Navigation menu