Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit
3,587
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2:
Line 2: + +
no edit summary
This page is very New Age-y. It's not really appropriate for an encyclopedia, really. It also appears that the original writer of the piece doesn't know too much about pre-modern Chinese science or Daojiao - and definitely not Daojia. [[User:Blackjuice|Blackjuice]] 05:52, 4 June 2007 (EDT)
This page is very New Age-y. It's not really appropriate for an encyclopedia, really. It also appears that the original writer of the piece doesn't know too much about pre-modern Chinese science or Daojiao - and definitely not Daojia. [[User:Blackjuice|Blackjuice]] 05:52, 4 June 2007 (EDT)
: In response to your comments: One of the originators of this article was Aschlafly. Since this project (Conservapedia) is his creation, I would defer to his judgement for what is appropriate. Your edits seem confusing, I am reverting because I believe the prior wording was more concise, clearer. It isn't really necessary to go into "pre-modern Chinese science" to define yin and yang - maybe that should be an article by itself? Also, Taoism/Daoism are interchangable terms, either are acceptable. --[[User:Taj|Taj]] 13:15, 4 June 2007 (EDT)