Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
317 bytes added ,  06:09, March 6, 2007
no edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:     
Um, can someone explain to me how this is at all relevant? If anything it sounds like a caricature of the sort of gossipy details that Conservapedia criticized Wikipedia for. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 00:45, 6 March 2007 (EST)
 
Um, can someone explain to me how this is at all relevant? If anything it sounds like a caricature of the sort of gossipy details that Conservapedia criticized Wikipedia for. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 00:45, 6 March 2007 (EST)
 +
 +
:You have a point.  I hesitated for that reason.  If the consensus is to remove it, I'm fine with that.  But the statement is about business, not personal gossip.  It adds relevancy to the Opium Wars and trade, which might otherwise be difficult to relate to.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 01:09, 6 March 2007 (EST)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,372

edits

Navigation menu