Changes

|url=http://www.creationbookpublishers.com/products/Without-Excuse.html

|url=http://www.creationbookpublishers.com/products/Without-Excuse.html

|isbn=9-789-02-4936-5

|isbn=9-789-02-4936-5

|quote=Remark on Dark Matter: As is well known much of the support for the existence of the dark matter is due to the observed very high velocities of gas molecules or galaxies.For example galaxies in the far-off Coma-cluster are observed whirling around one another faster than the laws of physics would allow. So is the mysteriously rapid rotation of spiral galaxies. Equation (2.25) clearly shows that the observed velocity by us is not the velocity measured by a local observer at a relative time <math>t</math> with respect to us. He measures a smaller velocity, and the more back in time the more the velocity decreases. Does this mean that the hypothetical dark matter can be abolished as the "luminiferous ether" was proved to be superfluous by special relativity?       

|quote=Remark on Dark Matter: As is well known much of the support for the existence of the dark matter is due to the observed very high velocities of gas molecules or galaxies. For example galaxies in the far-off Coma-cluster are observed whirling around one another faster than the laws of physics would allow. So is the mysteriously rapid rotation of spiral galaxies. Equation (2.25) clearly shows that the observed velocity by us is not the velocity measured by a local observer at a relative time <math>t</math> with respect to us. He measures a smaller velocity, and the more back in time the more the velocity decreases. Does this mean that the hypothetical dark matter can be abolished as the "luminiferous ether" was proved to be superfluous by special relativity?       

}}</ref> that [[atheist]]ic [[astronomer]]s infer when the actual mass of an observed celestial object is insufficient to account for an ostensible [[gravitation]]al effect.{{#tag:ref|cf. "...much of the support for the existence of the dark matter is due to the observed very high velocities of gas molecules or galaxies. For example galaxies in the far-off Coma-cluster are observed whirling around one another faster than the laws of physics would allow. So is the mysteriously rapid rotation of spiral galaxies."<ref name="CSR"/>|group=note}} It is one of two concepts (the other is [[dark energy]]) that [[evolution]]istic astronomers invoke to account for observations that old-[[universe]] cosmologies, including the [[Big Bang]], cannot explain. The term was introduced by Swiss astronomer Fritz Zwicky who hypothesized that it must be the gravity of unseen ''dark matter'' that holds fast moving galaxies together in [[Galaxy cluster|cluster]]s.<ref>{{Cite web  

}}</ref> that [[atheist]]ic [[astronomer]]s infer when the actual mass of an observed celestial object is insufficient to account for an ostensible [[gravitation]]al effect.{{#tag:ref|cf. "...much of the support for the existence of the dark matter is due to the observed very high velocities of gas molecules or galaxies. For example galaxies in the far-off Coma-cluster are observed whirling around one another faster than the laws of physics would allow. So is the mysteriously rapid rotation of spiral galaxies."<ref name="CSR"/>|group=note}} It is one of two concepts (the other is [[dark energy]]) that [[evolution]]istic astronomers invoke to account for observations that old-[[universe]] cosmologies, including the [[Big Bang]], cannot explain. The term was introduced by Swiss astronomer Fritz Zwicky who hypothesized that it must be the gravity of unseen ''dark matter'' that holds fast moving galaxies together in [[Galaxy cluster|cluster]]s.<ref>{{Cite web  

|author=F. Zwicky  

|author=F. Zwicky  

'''''Dark matter is an example of something unseen, far-fetched, and unverified by laboratory experiments which is fully believed by [[atheist]]ic college professors''''', and required of many science students to believe.  ''Dark matter'' is also the title of a fact-based [[Greatest Conservative Movies|great conservative movie]] having fabulous acting and top stars, but which was apparently buried by [[liberal]]s due to its unflattering portrayal of [[liberal]] academia.

'''''Dark matter is an example of something unseen, far-fetched, and unverified by laboratory experiments which is fully believed by [[atheist]]ic college professors''''', and required of many science students to believe.  ''Dark matter'' is also the title of a fact-based [[Greatest Conservative Movies|great conservative movie]] having fabulous acting and top stars, but which was apparently buried by [[liberal]]s due to its unflattering portrayal of [[liberal]] academia.

Nowadays there is an ongoing controversy taking place about the detectability status of Dark Matter. While proponents of the Friedmann Big Bang cosmologies supplied several papers (the most recent one (2012) published in [[Nature (journal)|journal Nature]]<ref name="Nature">{{cite web

Nowadays there is an ongoing controversy taking place about the detectability status of Dark Matter. While proponents of the Friedmann Big Bang cosmologies supplied several papers (the most recent one (2012) published in [[Nature (journal)|journal ''Nature'']]<ref name="Nature">{{cite web

|author=Zeeya Merali

|author=Zeeya Merali

|title=Dark matter’s tendrils revealed: Direct measurement of a dark-matter ‘filament’ confirms its existence in a galaxy supercluster.

|title=Dark matter’s tendrils revealed: Direct measurement of a dark-matter ‘filament’ confirms its existence in a galaxy supercluster.