Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
294,441
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + + + +
Talk:Alexei Arestovich (view source)
Revision as of 09:12, January 18, 2023
, 09:12, January 18, 2023no edit summary
This whole Dnepro missile attack is well worth understanding the details to understand much about modern warfare and modern propaganda warfare. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]</sup> 04:00, January 18, 2023 (EST)
This whole Dnepro missile attack is well worth understanding the details to understand much about modern warfare and modern propaganda warfare. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]</sup> 04:00, January 18, 2023 (EST)
There are two aspects for immediate consideration, [[technology]] and [[propaganda]]. :et's begin with technology:
'''Technology:''' Missile defense, the technology of modern war. Shooting down a missile with a missile. It's like shooting a bullet with a bullet while both are in flight (only the missile defense bullet must be faster to catch up with the incoming). While the offensive missile can be guided to a precision strike via a GPS laser-guided target point, the missile defense system has to have its ears up (radar on) to detect electronic signals from an incoming missile. To do this, they have to flip on the radar switch. Once the radar switch is flipped on, the missile defense system starts sending out radar signals, making the system itself a legitimate military target, per international law and conventions. Per international humanitarian law, military targets are not to be [laced in civilian areas, making the innocent residents vulnerable.