Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
295,249
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 196:
Line 196: + +
→Recent blocks
::On today's, activity in a cursory manner. I've been reviewing their activity over the past year for the past week. Do you really believe handing out the maximum without warning will stop or encourage sock activity? You're back to playing the same silly game an Admin whose name started with a K did, that had destructive effects for the project. Especially if it's motivated by personal animus for treatment recieved on another website. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]</sup> 19:19, January 23, 2023 (EST)
::On today's, activity in a cursory manner. I've been reviewing their activity over the past year for the past week. Do you really believe handing out the maximum without warning will stop or encourage sock activity? You're back to playing the same silly game an Admin whose name started with a K did, that had destructive effects for the project. Especially if it's motivated by personal animus for treatment recieved on another website. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]</sup> 19:19, January 23, 2023 (EST)
::What evidence do you have those two users deserve 6 month blocks without warning? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]</sup> 19:43, January 23, 2023 (EST)
::What evidence do you have those two users deserve 6 month blocks without warning? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]</sup> 19:43, January 23, 2023 (EST)
:::For example, you blocked the editor with the maximum without warning, but left in his most egregious conduct, i.e. a link to a porno site [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Brian_Tamaki&diff=1926359&oldid=1926355] (Note how it's formatted, <nowiki>www.xvi<!-- Nope -->deos.com</nowiki> to mask the site). This makes it look like you didn't do a thorough review of the activity, which of course is not always possible. But in the end, you treated two users with scant evidence of misconduct the same as a user who inserted a link to a porno site, while leaving the link intact. Is that fair? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]</sup> 20:21, January 23, 2023 (EST)