Block, SkipCaptcha, apieditor, Automoderated users, Bots, edit, ratelimit-exempt
58,183
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − + − + Line 11:
Line 11: − + Line 33:
Line 33: − + Line 41:
Line 41: − + − +
Spelling, grammar, and general cleanup, typos fixed: October 20, 2020 → October 20, 2020, (2), decision making → decision-making, a incriminating → an incriminating, ’s → 's
[[File:Laptop from hell 12-14-18.jpeg|right|400px|thumb|Laptop from hell, December 14, 2018.<ref>https://imgur.com/a/GVzUmjX#1eltgwu</ref>]]
[[File:Laptop from hell 12-14-18.jpeg|right|400px|thumb|Laptop from hell, December 14, 2018.<ref>https://imgur.com/a/GVzUmjX#1eltgwu</ref>]]
The Laptop from hell is a incriminating piece of evidence of criminal activity between the [[Biden family]] and the U.S.-backed [[neo-Nazi]] [[Maidan regime]].
The '''Laptop from hell''' is an incriminating piece of evidence of criminal activity between the [[Biden family]] and the U.S.-backed [[neo-Nazi]] [[Maidan regime]].
On October 20, 2020 the [[FBI]] announced that it was in possession of [[Hunter Biden]]'s laptop computer, that the emails were authentic, and the laptop and emails were not part of a [[Russian]] [[disinformation]] campaign designed to interfere in the [[2020 presidential election|United States 2020 presidential election]], despite the best efforts of the [[2020 Biden campaign|Biden campaign]] and their allied [[Big Tech]] and [[mainstream fake news media]] organizations to [[deceit|deceive]] the American people into believing so. The laptop was being held as evidence into a [[money-laundering]] scheme.<ref>https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/laptop-linked-to-hunter-biden-part-of-fbi-money-laundering-investigation</ref>
On October 20, 2020, the [[FBI]] announced that it was in possession of [[Hunter Biden]]'s laptop computer, that the emails were authentic, and the laptop and emails were not part of a [[Russian]] [[disinformation]] campaign designed to interfere in the [[2020 presidential election|United States 2020 presidential election]], despite the best efforts of the [[2020 Biden campaign|Biden campaign]] and their allied [[Big Tech]] and [[mainstream fake news media]] organizations to [[deceit|deceive]] the American people into believing so. The laptop was being held as evidence into a [[money-laundering]] scheme.<ref>https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/laptop-linked-to-hunter-biden-part-of-fbi-money-laundering-investigation</ref>
==Biden family corruption==
==Biden family corruption==
After that the biased [[NYT]] subdued the Hunter Biden laptop scandal in 2020 - before the election, by March 2022, the NYT suddenly found the time to write about it.
After that the biased [[NYT]] subdued the Hunter Biden laptop scandal in 2020 - before the election, by March 2022, the NYT suddenly found the time to write about it.
Sen. [[Ron Johnson]] blasted NY Times, former intel experts over Hunter Biden laptop: <i>People should be “outraged” at the New York Times for only just confirming the authenticity of Hunter Biden’s laptop.</i><ref>Mark Moore, "[https://nypost.com/2022/03/20/sen-johnson-blasts-ny-times-over-hunter-biden-laptop-reporting/ Sen. Johnson blasts NY Times, former intel experts over Hunter Biden laptop]," ''NYPost'', Mar 20, 2022.
Sen. [[Ron Johnson]] blasted NY Times, former intel experts over Hunter Biden laptop: ''People should be “outraged” at the New York Times for only just confirming the authenticity of Hunter Biden’s laptop.''<ref>Mark Moore, "[https://nypost.com/2022/03/20/sen-johnson-blasts-ny-times-over-hunter-biden-laptop-reporting/ Sen. Johnson blasts NY Times, former intel experts over Hunter Biden laptop]," ''NYPost'', Mar 20, 2022.
<blockquote>People should be “outraged” at the New York Times for only just confirming the authenticity of Hunter Biden’s laptop, Sen. Ron Johnson said Sunday, as he demanded apologies from the 51 former US intelligence experts who cast doubt on The Post’s reporting on the device.</blockquote></ref>
<blockquote>People should be “outraged” at the New York Times for only just confirming the authenticity of Hunter Biden’s laptop, Sen. Ron Johnson said Sunday, as he demanded apologies from the 51 former US intelligence experts who cast doubt on The Post’s reporting on the device.</blockquote></ref>
[[File:Politico fake news.png|right|400px|thumb]]
[[File:Politico fake news.png|right|400px|thumb]]
Top Twitter executive Vijaya Gadde was said to be responsible for the decision in 2020.</blockquote></ref>
Top Twitter executive Vijaya Gadde was said to be responsible for the decision in 2020.</blockquote></ref>
Following the release of the [[Twitter#The_Twitter_Files|The Twitter Files]], in Dec 2022, [[James Comer]] (R-KY) said on that he wants "every person at Twitter" to speak before Congress about the social media company's decision to limit access to the Hunter Biden laptop story.<ref>Herb Scribner, [https://www.axios.com/2022/12/03/james-comer-twitter-files-hunter-biden-laptop Comer wants Twitter employees to talk to Congress about Biden laptop story], Axios, Dec 3, 2022.</ref>
Following the release of the [[Twitter#The Twitter Files|The Twitter Files]], in Dec 2022, [[James Comer]] (R-KY) said on that he wants "every person at Twitter" to speak before Congress about the social media company's decision to limit access to the Hunter Biden laptop story.<ref>Herb Scribner, [https://www.axios.com/2022/12/03/james-comer-twitter-files-hunter-biden-laptop Comer wants Twitter employees to talk to Congress about Biden laptop story], Axios, Dec 3, 2022.</ref>
==The Twitter Files==
==The Twitter Files==
Musk exposed constitutional law violations on the part of the [[United States Government]] to interfere in elections. While a private entity does not have to respect free speech, the [[First Amendment]] to the [[Constitution]] prohibits the United States Government from silencing free speech. Twitter, under Jack Dorsey, prohibited free political speech at the behest of the United States Government.
Musk exposed constitutional law violations on the part of the [[United States Government]] to interfere in elections. While a private entity does not have to respect free speech, the [[First Amendment]] to the [[Constitution]] prohibits the United States Government from silencing free speech. Twitter, under Jack Dorsey, prohibited free political speech at the behest of the United States Government.
On December 2, 2022 journalist Matt Taibbi of ''[[Rolling Stone]]'' magazine began releasing the #TwitterFiles, otherwise known as Twitter’s internal communications related to [[censorship]], targeting, and political interference. The perception of the public impact of the revelations was likened to the [[Stasi]] files when the [[Soviet Union]] collapsed and the [[Berlin Wall]] came down.
On December 2, 2022, journalist Matt Taibbi of ''[[Rolling Stone]]'' magazine began releasing the #TwitterFiles, otherwise known as Twitter's internal communications related to [[censorship]], targeting, and political interference. The perception of the public impact of the revelations was likened to the [[Stasi]] files when the [[Soviet Union]] collapsed and the [[Berlin Wall]] came down.
This initial document dump focused on the decision making process that Twitter invoked to suppress the Laptop from Hell in the run up to the 2020 Presidential election. The internal emails released show that Twitter was absolutely engaging in political manipulation and, after they suspended the ''New York Post'', the oldest newspaper in the United States, looking for some sort of policy justification for their political actions.
This initial document dump focused on the decision-making process that Twitter invoked to suppress the Laptop from Hell in the run up to the 2020 Presidential election. The internal emails released show that Twitter was absolutely engaging in political manipulation and, after they suspended the ''New York Post'', the oldest newspaper in the United States, looking for some sort of policy justification for their political actions.
According to Taibbi, "The problem with the ‘hacked materials’ ruling, several sources said, was that this normally required an official/law enforcement finding of a hack. But such a finding never appears throughout what one executive describes as a ‘whirlwind’ 24-hour, company-wide mess.”
According to Taibbi, "The problem with the ‘hacked materials’ ruling, several sources said, was that this normally required an official/law enforcement finding of a hack. But such a finding never appears throughout what one executive describes as a ‘whirlwind’ 24-hour, company-wide mess.”