SkipCaptcha
35,519
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 6:
Line 6: − +
→Internal evidence favoring Markan priority over Augustinian hypothesis?
** Here's something interesting: Matthew's ordering, when one reads [https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew%2011-12&version=ESV Chapters 11–12], indicates chronological succession when it comes to the section about Jesus being Lord of the Sabbath and the section right before. [https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Mark+2-3&version=ESV Mark] and [https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke%205-6&version=ESV Luke], OTOH, don't.
** Here's something interesting: Matthew's ordering, when one reads [https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew%2011-12&version=ESV Chapters 11–12], indicates chronological succession when it comes to the section about Jesus being Lord of the Sabbath and the section right before. [https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Mark+2-3&version=ESV Mark] and [https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke%205-6&version=ESV Luke], OTOH, don't.
Using [[Occam's razor]], Markan priority seems like the most sensible conclusion based on the internal evidence. —[[User:LT|<code><span style="background:#FF8181">'''LT'''</span></code>]] '''''[[User talk:LT|<sup>(Matthew 26:52)</sup>]]''''' Friday, 19:54, January 26, 2023 (EST)
Using [[Occam's razor]], Markan priority seems like the much more sensible conclusion based on the internal evidence. —[[User:LT|<code><span style="background:#FF8181">'''LT'''</span></code>]] '''''[[User talk:LT|<sup>(Matthew 26:52)</sup>]]''''' Friday, 19:54, January 26, 2023 (EST)