Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:  
If you believe anybody or anything is unbiased, you probably believe in Sants Clause and the Tooth Fairy, too. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]</sup> 03:16, March 5, 2023 (EST)
 
If you believe anybody or anything is unbiased, you probably believe in Sants Clause and the Tooth Fairy, too. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]</sup> 03:16, March 5, 2023 (EST)
 
:[[User:RobSmith|RobS]] See the follow-up questions. It seems to remain neutral on the topic, saying each website has its benefits and drawbacks. [[User:ChenXiansheng|ChenXiansheng]] ([[User talk:ChenXiansheng|talk]]) 20:25, March 5, 2023 (EST)
 
:[[User:RobSmith|RobS]] See the follow-up questions. It seems to remain neutral on the topic, saying each website has its benefits and drawbacks. [[User:ChenXiansheng|ChenXiansheng]] ([[User talk:ChenXiansheng|talk]]) 20:25, March 5, 2023 (EST)
 +
 +
::Thank you, that was very helpful. In reading those responses, it's fairly obvious ChatGPT draws much on Wikipedia's database for its alleged "intelligence". Bu ultimately, ChatGPT reveals its own bias here: "Ultimately, it's up to each '''individual''' to evaluate these projects and determine....". Note: "[[individiualism|individual]]" and not "[[collective]]".  Seems ChatGPT has a rather conservative bias, and not a socialist collective bias as RW & WP promote. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]</sup> 14:34, March 6, 2023 (EST)
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
295,580

edits

Navigation menu