| | ''Gabaldoni v. Washington County. Hospital Ass'n'', 250 F.3d 255 (4th Cir. 2001) (affirming summary judgment by the district court in a lawsuit challenging a termination of a physician's clinical privileges and denied his application for reappointment to the medical staff, in a lawsuit contract and tort claims against hospital entities; there were no [[antitrust]] or [[Sherman Act]] claims in this case). | | ''Gabaldoni v. Washington County. Hospital Ass'n'', 250 F.3d 255 (4th Cir. 2001) (affirming summary judgment by the district court in a lawsuit challenging a termination of a physician's clinical privileges and denied his application for reappointment to the medical staff, in a lawsuit contract and tort claims against hospital entities; there were no [[antitrust]] or [[Sherman Act]] claims in this case). |
| − | Hein-Muniz v. Aiken Regional Med. Ctrs., 532 Fed. App’x 342 (4th Cir. 2013) (affirming summary judgment against a physician who challenged a hospital's termination of his privileges, but no mention of [[antitrust]] or the [[Sherman Act]] in this appeal or in district court. Instead the claims were for: breach of contract, breach of contract accompanied by a fraudulent act, violations of the South Carolina and the United States Constitutions and HCQIA, illegality, conspiracy, unfair trade practices, breach of fiduciary duty, and interference with prospective contract. Relief sought included declaratory judgment, actual and compensatory damages, punitive damages, special damages, injunction, and attorney's fees.). | + | ''Hein-Muniz v. Aiken Regional Med. Ctrs.'', 532 Fed. App’x 342 (4th Cir. 2013) (affirming summary judgment against a physician who challenged a hospital's termination of his privileges, but no mention of [[antitrust]] or the [[Sherman Act]] in this appeal or in district court. Instead the claims were for: breach of contract, breach of contract accompanied by a fraudulent act, violations of the South Carolina and the United States Constitutions and HCQIA, illegality, conspiracy, unfair trade practices, breach of fiduciary duty, and interference with prospective contract. Relief sought included declaratory judgment, actual and compensatory damages, punitive damages, special damages, injunction, and attorney's fees.). |
| − | Oksanen v. Page Memorial Hosp., 945 F.2d 696 (4th Cir.1991) (en banc) | + | ''Oksanen v. Page Memorial Hosp.'', 945 F.2d 696, 699 (4th Cir.1991) (en banc) (affirming summary judgment affirmed based on intra-corporate doctrine: "the Board of Trustees and the medical staff of Page Memorial comprised a single entity during the peer review process. Because an entity cannot conspire with itself, the Board and the staff lacked the capacity to conspire. While the members of a medical staff may have the capacity to conspire among themselves, such a conspiracy did not occur in this case. We likewise affirm the district court's dismissal of Oksanen's other claims and its refusal to cloak in federal antitrust law what is in essence a workplace dispute.") (citing ''Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.'', 467 U.S. 752 (1984)). |
| − | Poliner v. Tex. Health Sys., 537 F.3d 368 (5th Cir. 2008) | + | ''Poliner v. Tex. Health Sys.'', 537 F.3d 368 (5th Cir. 2008) (reversal of a jury trial judgment for the physician) |