Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
178 bytes added ,  18:39, March 11, 2023
no edit summary
Line 28: Line 28:     
Sugarbaker v. SSM Health Care, 190 F.3d 905 (8th Cir. 1999)  
 
Sugarbaker v. SSM Health Care, 190 F.3d 905 (8th Cir. 1999)  
−
  −
Torbett v. Wheeling Dollar Sav. & Tr. Co., 314 S.E.2d 166 (W. Va. 1983)
      
''Tshibaka v. Sernulka'', 673 Fed. App’x. 272 (4th Cir. 2016) (hospital “[i]mmunity applies unless—viewing the totality of the circumstances in an objectively reasonable manner—the aggrieved physician rebuts the presumption that the professional review action satisfied HCQIA.”  The [[Fourth Circuit]] thereby affirmed a district court grant of [[summary judgment]] to the hospital and its CEO, while remanding in favor of plaintiff's claim for defamation).
 
''Tshibaka v. Sernulka'', 673 Fed. App’x. 272 (4th Cir. 2016) (hospital “[i]mmunity applies unless—viewing the totality of the circumstances in an objectively reasonable manner—the aggrieved physician rebuts the presumption that the professional review action satisfied HCQIA.”  The [[Fourth Circuit]] thereby affirmed a district court grant of [[summary judgment]] to the hospital and its CEO, while remanding in favor of plaintiff's claim for defamation).
Line 44: Line 42:     
Nemet Chevrolet v. Consumeraffairs.com, 591 F.3d 250 (4th Cir. 2009)
 
Nemet Chevrolet v. Consumeraffairs.com, 591 F.3d 250 (4th Cir. 2009)
 +
 +
== Tortious Interference ==
 +
 +
''Torbett v. Wheeling Dollar Sav. & Tr. Co.'', 314 S.E.2d 166 (W. Va. 1983) (pleading and proving deliberate intent to harm a contractual relationship is required on a claim for tortious interference in [[West Virginia]])
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,341

edits

Navigation menu