Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit, Moderators, protect
27,867
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 165:
Line 165: − +
→Release of migrants into the U.S. interior w/o court dates
==Release of migrants into the U.S. interior w/o court dates==
==Release of migrants into the U.S. interior w/o court dates==
In 2023, nearly two dozen Republican-led states have backed Florida’s legal challenge to a Biden administration policy that allowed for the release of migrants into the U.S. interior without court dates<ref>Adam Shaw, [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/23-gop-led-states-back-florida-challenge-biden-policy-releasing-migrants-without-court-dates 23 GOP-led states back Florida challenge to Biden policy releasing migrants without court dates], ''Fox News'', May 27, 2023.<blockquote><small>
In 2023, nearly two dozen Republican-led states have backed Florida’s legal challenge to a Biden administration policy that allowed for the release of migrants into the U.S. interior without court dates.<ref>Adam Shaw, [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/23-gop-led-states-back-florida-challenge-biden-policy-releasing-migrants-without-court-dates 23 GOP-led states back Florida challenge to Biden policy releasing migrants without court dates], ''Fox News'', May 27, 2023.<blockquote><small>
The policy was blocked hours before Title 42 ended.
The policy was blocked hours before Title 42 ended.
Nearly two dozen Republican-led states have backed Florida’s legal challenge to a Biden administration policy that allowed for the release of migrants into the U.S. interior without court dates -- but was blocked just hours before the expiration of the Title 42 public health order.
Nearly two dozen Republican-led states have backed Florida’s legal challenge to a Biden administration policy that allowed for the release of migrants into the U.S. interior without court dates -- but was blocked just hours before the expiration of the Title 42 public health order.