Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
So why would Roman soldiers take that risk of error, rather than simply use the sturdier approach of placing the nails in the wrists instead? They likely would use the easier, more secure approach of using the wrists, as shown in the [[Shroud of Turi
Line 6: Line 6:     
Although there is extensive written evidence about the [[Roman]] practice of crucifixion, which was learned from the [[Carthaginian]]s, only 5 crucified artifacts have been discovered in modern times: "ones from Gavello, Italy, and Mendes, Egypt, have been identified .... Construction workers in Jerusalem found the only other one featuring a nail in 1968, but the body was not intact, and thus is not fully accepted as firm evidence of crucifixion ...."<ref name="Artnet"/>
 
Although there is extensive written evidence about the [[Roman]] practice of crucifixion, which was learned from the [[Carthaginian]]s, only 5 crucified artifacts have been discovered in modern times: "ones from Gavello, Italy, and Mendes, Egypt, have been identified .... Construction workers in Jerusalem found the only other one featuring a nail in 1968, but the body was not intact, and thus is not fully accepted as firm evidence of crucifixion ...."<ref name="Artnet"/>
−
== Nail in the Wrist ==
+
== Nail in the Wrists ==
 
The solitary discovery of a crucified body in [[Jerusalem]] concluded that there was a nail mark on the wrist, while subsequent researchers disputed that and asserted that it was merely a scratch.<ref>https://www.forbes.com/sites/kristinakillgrove/2015/12/08/this-bone-provides-the-only-skeletal-evidence-for-crucifixion-in-the-ancient-world/?sh=3bfc2c60476d</ref>
 
The solitary discovery of a crucified body in [[Jerusalem]] concluded that there was a nail mark on the wrist, while subsequent researchers disputed that and asserted that it was merely a scratch.<ref>https://www.forbes.com/sites/kristinakillgrove/2015/12/08/this-bone-provides-the-only-skeletal-evidence-for-crucifixion-in-the-ancient-world/?sh=3bfc2c60476d</ref>
 +
== Nail in the Hands? ==
 +
Physicians studied the possibility of suspending a crucified man with names through his hands rather than his wrists and concluded that it is possible, but requires placing the nail in a specific and precise location in the hand.  Otherwise, the weight of the body would cause the nail to tear through the hand.
 +
 +
So why would [[Roman]] soldiers take that risk of error, rather than simply use the sturdier approach of placing the nails in the wrists instead?  They likely would use the easier, more secure approach of using the wrists, as shown in the [[Shroud of Turin]].
 
== See also ==
 
== See also ==
 
*[[Shroud of Turin]]
 
*[[Shroud of Turin]]
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,256

edits

Navigation menu