Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1,103: Line 1,103:     
[[File:⁨⁨Der_Ṭog⁩_-_⁨דער_טאג⁩,_18_July_1935.PNG|thumb|'Swastika, with the inscription "Long live [sic] Hitler" on the Jerusalem Gate. Jerusalem, July 17.  - A swastika sign, with the inscription "Viva Hitler!" [sic], appeared today on the cemetery, opposite the tombs of the Jewish kings.  Apparently, the Arabs painted the Hitlerite swastika there.' (July 18, 1935 report)]]
 
[[File:⁨⁨Der_Ṭog⁩_-_⁨דער_טאג⁩,_18_July_1935.PNG|thumb|'Swastika, with the inscription "Long live [sic] Hitler" on the Jerusalem Gate. Jerusalem, July 17.  - A swastika sign, with the inscription "Viva Hitler!" [sic], appeared today on the cemetery, opposite the tombs of the Jewish kings.  Apparently, the Arabs painted the Hitlerite swastika there.' (July 18, 1935 report)]]
−
Seen on July 17, 1935 in Jerusalem:<ref>⁨⁨Der Tog⁩ - ⁨דער טאג⁩, 18 July 1935.
+
Seen on July 17, 1935<ref>[https://www.jta.org/archive/gates-of-zion-defaced-by-swastika-of-arabs Gates of Zion Defaced by Swastika of Arabs], ''JTA'', July 18, 1935. .<blockquote><small>
 +
A Nazi swastika sign carrying the inscription 'Heil Hitler" appeared today on the Gates of Zion in Jerusalem, opposite the tombs of the Jewish kings.
 +
The sign was obviously painted by Arabs. Palestine police authorities are investigating the case.</small></blockquote></ref> in Jerusalem:<ref>⁨⁨Der Tog⁩ - ⁨דער טאג⁩, 18 July 1935.
 
[https://www.nli.org.il/en/newspapers/dertog/1935/07/18/01/article/19/].
 
[https://www.nli.org.il/en/newspapers/dertog/1935/07/18/01/article/19/].
 
<blockquote><font size=1>
 
<blockquote><font size=1>
Line 1,781: Line 1,783:       −
Commenting (Sep.13.38) on Hitler's speech (mentioning Palestine's Arabs), while casting doubts on Hitler's sincere "concern" for them, it still, without being  convinced Hitler would be of benefit, boasted Nazi anti-Semitism in the same breath defined what is a dictatorship, ''Falastin'': ''a dictatorship was really a State which had freed itself of Jewish influence, while democracies were countries which still bore that onus."<ref>
+
[[File:Falastin.Sep.13.1938.jpg|thumb|Falastin "defines" dictatorship - Sep 13, 1938]]
 +
Commenting (Sep.13.38) on Hitler's speech (mentioning Palestine's Arabs), while casting doubts on Hitler's sincere "concern" for them, it still, without being  convinced Hitler would be of benefit, boasted Nazi anti-Semitism in the same breath defined what is a dictatorship, ''Falastin'': ''a dictatorship was really a State which had freed [sic] itself of Jewish [sic] influence[sic], while democracies were countries which still bore that onus.''<ref>
 
[https://www.nli.org.il/en/newspapers/pls/1938/09/16/01/page/2 The Palestine Post, 16 September 1938 — Page 2]. [https://www.nli.org.il/en/newspapers/?a=d&d=pls19380916-01.1.2]. [https://www.nli.org.il/en/newspapers/pls/1938/09/16/01/article/23/].
 
[https://www.nli.org.il/en/newspapers/pls/1938/09/16/01/page/2 The Palestine Post, 16 September 1938 — Page 2]. [https://www.nli.org.il/en/newspapers/?a=d&d=pls19380916-01.1.2]. [https://www.nli.org.il/en/newspapers/pls/1938/09/16/01/article/23/].
 
<blockquote>
 
<blockquote>
Line 1,788: Line 1,791:  
Writing in its Tuesday's issue, Falastin devoted a leading article to the theory that Palestine was in the forefront of world affairs, and that the position in Palestine had become more grave in view of Herr Hitler's speech at Nuremberg.
 
Writing in its Tuesday's issue, Falastin devoted a leading article to the theory that Palestine was in the forefront of world affairs, and that the position in Palestine had become more grave in view of Herr Hitler's speech at Nuremberg.
 
The paper expressed doubts as to whether the German Fuehrer was really and sincerely concerned with Arab rights or merely championed them in order to annoy the Democracies. The reference to Palestine in Herr Hitler's speech showed, the paper added, how parlous the situation here really was.
 
The paper expressed doubts as to whether the German Fuehrer was really and sincerely concerned with Arab rights or merely championed them in order to annoy the Democracies. The reference to Palestine in Herr Hitler's speech showed, the paper added, how parlous the situation here really was.
−
<i>'Falastin' then explained that a dictatorship was really a State which had freed itself of Jewish influence, while democracies were countries which still bore that onus.</i></blockquote></ref><ref>The Advocate: America's Jewish Journal. Vol. 94. United States: n.p., 1938. [https://books.google.com/books?id=mIOWaF2S4FYC&q=%22falastin%22+hitler 20].
+
<i>'Falastin' then explained that a dictatorship was really a State which had freed [sic] itself of Jewish [sic] influence [sic], while democracies were countries which still bore that onus.</i></blockquote></ref><ref>The Advocate: America's Jewish Journal. Vol. 94. United States: n.p., 1938. [https://books.google.com/books?id=mIOWaF2S4FYC&q=%22falastin%22+hitler 20].
 
<blockquote>
 
<blockquote>
−
Falastin, commenting on Hitler's speech at Nuremburg, declared that a Dictatorship was really a state which had freed itself from Jewish influence, while democracies countries which still bore that onus.</blockquote></ref>
+
Falastin, commenting on Hitler's speech at Nuremburg, declared that a Dictatorship was really a state which had freed [sic] itself from Jewish [sic] influence [sic], while democracies countries which still bore that onus.</blockquote></ref>
 +
 
     
Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit, Moderators, protect
28,120

edits

Navigation menu