SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit
5,443
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 29:
Line 29: + + +
→History and lies
Sarkar wrote an article on July 4, 2022, pushing the false conspiracy theory that pro-life campaigners and politicians want to take women back "to the Victorian era".<ref>[https://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/politics/article/anti-abortion-campaigners-mps-uk The anti-abortion lobby is on the rise in the UK. We can't get complacent]</ref>
Sarkar wrote an article on July 4, 2022, pushing the false conspiracy theory that pro-life campaigners and politicians want to take women back "to the Victorian era".<ref>[https://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/politics/article/anti-abortion-campaigners-mps-uk The anti-abortion lobby is on the rise in the UK. We can't get complacent]</ref>
On 24 April 2023, Sarkar defended her fellow far-left racist [[Diane Abbott]], who had her Labour parliamentary whip removed after making comments described by Labour leader [[Keir Starmer]] as "[[antisemitic]]". She drew comparisons to other racist Labour MPs such as [[Rupa Huq]], best known for describing [[Kwasi Kwarteng]] as "superficially black", and antisemite Steve Reed and said that Abbott should have her whip restored as a "matter of fairness".<ref>[https://twitter.com/AyoCaesar/status/1650505302838525953 When Steve Reed called a Jewish Tory donor a “puppet master”, he didn't have the Labour whip removed...]</ref>
On 2 May 2023, during the run-up to the coronation of King Charles III, Sarkar hypocritically described the British Royal Family as "neither a fair nor representative institution", despite defending Meghan Markle, a privileged liberal elitist, in the same delusional rant.<ref>[https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1765595/royal-family-weird-ash-sarker-newsnight Fury as Royal Family branded ‘cartel of very weird people’ by left-wing radical Ash Sarkar]</ref>
On 2 May 2023, during the run-up to the coronation of King Charles III, Sarkar hypocritically described the British Royal Family as "neither a fair nor representative institution", despite defending Meghan Markle, a privileged liberal elitist, in the same delusional rant.<ref>[https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1765595/royal-family-weird-ash-sarker-newsnight Fury as Royal Family branded ‘cartel of very weird people’ by left-wing radical Ash Sarkar]</ref>
Ash Sarkar came under fire in late June 2023 for comments she made about the then-ongoing Titan submersible incident. On 23 June, Sarkar used the incident, in which it was later revealed that all 5 involved were killed, to claim that the rich "aren't being taxed enough".<ref>[https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/22782395/ash-sarkar-fury-titan-tragedy-rich-pay-more-tax/ TAX JIBE FURY Left-wing Guardian columnist Ash Sarkar sparks fury with Titan tweets claiming rich people should pay more tax]</ref> When the death of all participants were confirmed, Sarkar described the tragedy as being "born of hubris" in a Tweet condemned as 'vile' by ''The Express''.<ref>[https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/1783649/Ash-Sarkar-submersible-victims-backlash-lord-austin Now Ash Sarkar claims Titanic sub tragedy was 'born of hubris' in another 'vile' tweet]</ref>
Ash Sarkar came under fire in late June 2023 for comments she made about the then-ongoing Titan submersible incident. On 23 June, Sarkar used the incident, in which it was later revealed that all 5 involved were killed, to claim that the rich "aren't being taxed enough".<ref>[https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/22782395/ash-sarkar-fury-titan-tragedy-rich-pay-more-tax/ TAX JIBE FURY Left-wing Guardian columnist Ash Sarkar sparks fury with Titan tweets claiming rich people should pay more tax]</ref> When the death of all participants were confirmed, Sarkar described the tragedy as being "born of hubris" in a Tweet condemned as 'vile' by ''The Express''.<ref>[https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/1783649/Ash-Sarkar-submersible-victims-backlash-lord-austin Now Ash Sarkar claims Titanic sub tragedy was 'born of hubris' in another 'vile' tweet]</ref>
==References ==
==References ==
<references/>
<references/>