Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,427
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 12:
Line 12: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
→NATO/Ukraine
[[File:Nuland-in-ukraine.jpg|right|350px|thumb|Ukrainian [[neo-Nazi]] [[Oleh Tyahnybok]] with (left) Victorias Nuland (center), [[Yarsenyi Yatsenyuk]], and (right) [[Vitali Klitschko]] (rear).]]
[[File:Nuland-in-ukraine.jpg|right|350px|thumb|Ukrainian [[neo-Nazi]] [[Oleh Tyahnybok]] with (left) Victorias Nuland (center), [[Yarsenyi Yatsenyuk]], and (right) [[Vitali Klitschko]] (rear).]]
During the [[Maidan coup]], the notorious "F the EU" conversation between State Dept employees [[Victoria Nuland]] and Amb Pyatt when they were deciding on which puppet to make Prime minister, Nuland said, "Yats is the guy. He's got the governing experience bla bla bla". Well, "Yats", or [[Arseniy Yatsenyuk]] apparently now has had [https://www.bitchute.com/video/8YRQXb0TRlBF/ an epiphany about Nazism in Ukraine.] Is he ambling for a job in a post-Zelensky Ukraine? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]</sup> 20:10, June 27, 2023 (EDT)
During the [[Maidan coup]], the notorious "F the EU" conversation between State Dept employees [[Victoria Nuland]] and Amb Pyatt when they were deciding on which puppet to make Prime minister, Nuland said, "Yats is the guy. He's got the governing experience bla bla bla". Well, "Yats", or [[Arseniy Yatsenyuk]] apparently now has had [https://www.bitchute.com/video/8YRQXb0TRlBF/ an epiphany about Nazism in Ukraine.] Is he ambling for a job in a post-Zelensky Ukraine? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]</sup> 20:10, June 27, 2023 (EDT)
== I spoke to Andy about the main page talk dissension and infighting ==
I spoke to Andy about the main page talk dissension and infighting.
Andy mentioned one of the root causes. He said that some editors are ignoring the [[90/10 rule]].
I think Andy is correction about this matter.
'''What is the 90/10 rule?'''
The [[Conservapedia:90/10 rule|90/10 rule]] is designed to encourage productive edits to our encyclopedia articles, essays and debates (see also: [https://conservapedia.com/Category:Essays Conservapedia essays] and [https://conservapedia.com/Category:Conservapedia_Debates Conservapedia debates]). The purpose of the 90/10 rule is to discourage unproductive editing such as belligerent editing and [[troll]]ing at Conservapedia (Please see: [[Conservapedia:Avoid personal remarks]] and [[Conservapedia:Inappropriate/trolling behavior - Examples]]).
The 90/10 rule discourages users from spending 90% of their time complaining, carping, cutting people down and forming [[cabal]]s at Conservapedia - and only 10% actively helping to craft good encyclopedia articles/essays and participate in Conservapedia debates. Useful editing means making worthwhile edits and includes collaborative efforts to improve articles/essays on talk pages. The rule is applied to a person's editing activitity as a whole and not smaller periods of editing. For example, if users have a history of productive editing and they are editing talk pages to improve articles/essays, participate in debates or make various improvements to Conservapedia, the 90/10 rule will not be applied to them. The 90/10 rule is only applied to disruptive editors.
Conservapedia encourages collaboration to improve articles, essays and debates. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 20:15, June 27, 2023 (EDT)