Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
133 bytes added ,  16:37, June 12, 2007
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:  
Perhaps we should remove the History section here.  I think it might be more appropriate for the [[Abolitionism]] article. Plus it seems strange to have a direct quote represent the history of abolitionists. --[[User:Colest|Colest]] 12:25, 12 June 2007 (EDT)
 
Perhaps we should remove the History section here.  I think it might be more appropriate for the [[Abolitionism]] article. Plus it seems strange to have a direct quote represent the history of abolitionists. --[[User:Colest|Colest]] 12:25, 12 June 2007 (EDT)
 
:I agree that the history would be more appropriate in the [[Abolitionism]] article since it's the history of the movement itself.  I thought it would be prudent to make it clear that the current history section is a direct quote from a previously uncited, copyrighted source.  When moving it to Abolitionism it would probably be best to rewrite it to avoid the quoting.--[[User:Brian|Brian]] 12:32, 12 June 2007 (EDT)
 
:I agree that the history would be more appropriate in the [[Abolitionism]] article since it's the history of the movement itself.  I thought it would be prudent to make it clear that the current history section is a direct quote from a previously uncited, copyrighted source.  When moving it to Abolitionism it would probably be best to rewrite it to avoid the quoting.--[[User:Brian|Brian]] 12:32, 12 June 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
Thank you for your work.  I support whatever you gentlemen decide. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 12:37, 12 June 2007 (EDT)
nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
13,818

edits

Navigation menu