To test whether the party asserting jurisdiction has met its burden, a court may rely upon “(1) the complaint alone; (2) the complaint supplemented by undisputed facts evidenced in the record; or (3) the complaint supplemented by undisputed facts plus the court’s resolution of disputed facts.” ''Barrera–Montenegro v. United States'', 74 F.3d 657, 659 (5th Cir. 1996). When standing is challenged in a motion to dismiss, the court “must ‘accept as true all material allegations of the complaint and ... construe the complaint in favor of the complaining party.’” ''Ass’n of Am. Physicians & Surgeons v. Tex. Med. Bd.'', 627 F.3d 547, 550 (5th Cir. 2010) (quoting ''Pennell v. City of San Jose'', 438 U.S. 1, 7 (1988)). | To test whether the party asserting jurisdiction has met its burden, a court may rely upon “(1) the complaint alone; (2) the complaint supplemented by undisputed facts evidenced in the record; or (3) the complaint supplemented by undisputed facts plus the court’s resolution of disputed facts.” ''Barrera–Montenegro v. United States'', 74 F.3d 657, 659 (5th Cir. 1996). When standing is challenged in a motion to dismiss, the court “must ‘accept as true all material allegations of the complaint and ... construe the complaint in favor of the complaining party.’” ''Ass’n of Am. Physicians & Surgeons v. Tex. Med. Bd.'', 627 F.3d 547, 550 (5th Cir. 2010) (quoting ''Pennell v. City of San Jose'', 438 U.S. 1, 7 (1988)). |