| | De Santis is also a Former Soldier/Veteran who has Combat Experience and has also supported Ukraine in the past. De Santis knows he has to jump through a few hoops on the Ukraine issue; he should read the polls and the majority that support arming Ukraine and Taiwan: "Solid majorities of Americans support providing weaponry to Ukraine to defend itself against Russia and believe that such aid demonstrates to China and other U.S. rivals a will to protect U.S. interests and allies, according to a Reuters/Ipsos survey. The two-day poll that was concluded on Tuesday charted a sharp rise in backing for arming Ukraine, with 65% of the respondents approving of the shipments compared with 46% in a May poll." https://www.reuters.com/world/most-americans-support-us-arming-ukraine-reutersipsos-2023-06-28/ This is a very small portion of the US Military Budget, and it greatly advances Us Interests in the region. Yes, I agree all NATO Allies, including European Countries, and Asian Countries too as and when they join, should spend the same proportionate amount of GDP, be it 2% or 2.5% or 3% as is now being talked about, on Military Spending. When the Good Guys are strong, the bad guys. When the bad guys are, the good guys have to fear. And to Rob: in 2016, it was only around March, that there were just 3 candidates left in the race. Finally, around May, Trump won at that time, and Cruz dropped out. Let's see how it goes, a lot will depend on the Campaigns and also the Debates. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]<sup>[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]</sup> 21:44, July 12, 2023 (EDT) | | De Santis is also a Former Soldier/Veteran who has Combat Experience and has also supported Ukraine in the past. De Santis knows he has to jump through a few hoops on the Ukraine issue; he should read the polls and the majority that support arming Ukraine and Taiwan: "Solid majorities of Americans support providing weaponry to Ukraine to defend itself against Russia and believe that such aid demonstrates to China and other U.S. rivals a will to protect U.S. interests and allies, according to a Reuters/Ipsos survey. The two-day poll that was concluded on Tuesday charted a sharp rise in backing for arming Ukraine, with 65% of the respondents approving of the shipments compared with 46% in a May poll." https://www.reuters.com/world/most-americans-support-us-arming-ukraine-reutersipsos-2023-06-28/ This is a very small portion of the US Military Budget, and it greatly advances Us Interests in the region. Yes, I agree all NATO Allies, including European Countries, and Asian Countries too as and when they join, should spend the same proportionate amount of GDP, be it 2% or 2.5% or 3% as is now being talked about, on Military Spending. When the Good Guys are strong, the bad guys. When the bad guys are, the good guys have to fear. And to Rob: in 2016, it was only around March, that there were just 3 candidates left in the race. Finally, around May, Trump won at that time, and Cruz dropped out. Let's see how it goes, a lot will depend on the Campaigns and also the Debates. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]<sup>[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]</sup> 21:44, July 12, 2023 (EDT) |
| | + | In 2015, after Russia's illegal annexation of Crimea in Ukraine, De Santis said: "We in the Congress have been urging the president, I've been, to provide arms to Ukraine," DeSantis said in 2015." De Santis holds the classic Peace through Strength position of Reagan imo, although I admit foreign policy is his weakest link. That's also part of why I think Nikki Haley would be his Ideal VP, as that's her strength. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]<sup>[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]</sup> 21:45, July 12, 2023 (EDT) |