Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit, Moderators, protect
28,107
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 531:
Line 531: + + + + + + + + + + Line 4,917:
Line 4,927: − +
Nazism at Arab Palestinians (view source)
Revision as of 04:13, July 13, 2023
, 04:13, July 13, 2023→Nazi era
אז עזבו היהודים את המקום.
אז עזבו היהודים את המקום.
</blockquote></font></ref>
</blockquote></font></ref>
[[File:Adrien Arcand.jpg|thumb|Canadian Fuhrer, Adrien Arcand]]
[[File:Arcand, 1932 and Falastin.jpg|thumb|Arcand in 1932 and Falastin]]
Fascist sympathies at the major newspaper at the time - at the time, already in 1932:
The ''Canadian Fuhrer'',<ref>Nadeau, Jean-Francois. [https://books.google.com/books?id=D630umvXNKoC The Canadian Fuhrer: The Life of Adrien Arcand]. James Lorimer & Company, 2011.</ref> Adrien Arcand, in 1932, had included ''Falastin'' in the list of fascist journals sympathizing with him.<ref>Adrien Arcand:<blockquote><small>
Elsewhere, the Mirror and the Coglu have received congratulations on several occasions over the past six months, long reproductions and sympathetic mentions in "La Libre parole" in Paris; the Encyclopedia of Menton, France; "Der Hammer", Leipzig; "Nationalistul", Jassy, Romania; "The Fascist," London; "The Patriot", London; "Falastin", national organ of the Arabs, Jaffa, Palestine; "The American Guard", Brookline, Mass.; "Volkischer Beobachter" (Adolph Hitler's diary), Munich; "Der Sturmer", Nürnberg; "The New Journal...</small></blockquote>
Le Miroir, Jul 10, 1932; Le Goglu, Nov 4, 1932.</ref>
<font size=1>[Once in a while, Falastin, for practical and appeasing the Brits, especially in face of threats of censoring it, it proclaimed a supposed "pro Allied" piece (as in June 1934) stating that Arabs were anti Zionists before Nazism, diminishes not the factor: the paper’s overall underline, Hitler glorification. Just over a year prior to this weak reply, Falastin wrote (May/1933): "Noble Hitler," justifying his persecution of the Jews. It also dragged into its piece, the favorite Nazi tool, the fake "Protocols." Well, of course Hitler admiration derived from anti-Jewish bigotry. That is the entire point. Despite Arab-anti-Semitism-apologist Achcar's pathetically celebratory quoting this "reply" to criticism, by Falastin, which proves nothing, as its main "exhibit" - knows fully well he can not wash Falastin's Nazism away. Though, Istiqlal's al-Difa'a was worse and more openly so].</font>
<font size=1>[Once in a while, Falastin, for practical and appeasing the Brits, especially in face of threats of censoring it, it proclaimed a supposed "pro Allied" piece (as in June 1934) stating that Arabs were anti Zionists before Nazism, diminishes not the factor: the paper’s overall underline, Hitler glorification. Just over a year prior to this weak reply, Falastin wrote (May/1933): "Noble Hitler," justifying his persecution of the Jews. It also dragged into its piece, the favorite Nazi tool, the fake "Protocols." Well, of course Hitler admiration derived from anti-Jewish bigotry. That is the entire point. Despite Arab-anti-Semitism-apologist Achcar's pathetically celebratory quoting this "reply" to criticism, by Falastin, which proves nothing, as its main "exhibit" - knows fully well he can not wash Falastin's Nazism away. Though, Istiqlal's al-Difa'a was worse and more openly so. And how about Falastin's position ahead of Nuremberg trials that Nazism is a form like any other, as well as portraying Nazi war criminals in a positive light before and after those Trials?].</font>