Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
293,008
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 70:
Line 70: + + + + + + + +
→Essay space used to create incivil attack pages on other editors
:::You should have stuck with Celente, rather than [[NeverTrumpers]], like [https://www.conservapedia.com/Trump_Derangement_Syndrome#cite_note-77 Ian Bremmer.] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 14:40, August 12, 2023 (EDT)
:::You should have stuck with Celente, rather than [[NeverTrumpers]], like [https://www.conservapedia.com/Trump_Derangement_Syndrome#cite_note-77 Ian Bremmer.] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 14:40, August 12, 2023 (EDT)
{{quotebox-float|"The relevant metric now isn't left versus right. It's [[anti-establishment]] versus [[pro-establishment]].
Namely, do you think the loss of trust that these institutions of authority have suffered is valid or not? Do you think that they deserve the contempt in which they are held by a large portion of the population?
I believe it's absolutely justified to hold them in contempt.
That's the fundamental distinction that defines our political spectrum more than old definitions of left versus right. [https://www.zerohedge.com/political/greenwald-its-not-left-vs-right-anymore-its-anti-establishment-versus-pro-establshment]}}
:::And no, I'm not in bed with your pro-establishment views from the [[Atlantic Council]], the [[Council on Foreign Relations]], the [[Open Society Foundations]], the [[London School of Economics]], etc. etc. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 15:11, August 15, 2023 (EDT)
::::RobS, you are just angry that the evidence suggests that in terms of international relations, the evidence indicates that the world is largely bipolar and not multipolar. See: [[Essay: The myth of multipolarity. What do the terms unipolar, bipolar and multipolar mean as far as international relations?]]
::::RobS, you are just angry that the evidence suggests that in terms of international relations, the evidence indicates that the world is largely bipolar and not multipolar. See: [[Essay: The myth of multipolarity. What do the terms unipolar, bipolar and multipolar mean as far as international relations?]]