Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 990: Line 990:  
:Romanist persecution of Jews during the Dark Ages, especially Messianic Jews, is [https://jewsforjesus.org/learn/why-many-jewish-people-think-christianity-is-antisemitic well-documented]. And as for Pope Pius XII and the Holocaust, you're only sharing one side of the story. [https://forward.com/fast-forward/561324/newly-discovered-letter-shows-pope-pius-xii-almost-certainly-knew-about-nazi-death-camps/ New revelations have something different to say.]
 
:Romanist persecution of Jews during the Dark Ages, especially Messianic Jews, is [https://jewsforjesus.org/learn/why-many-jewish-people-think-christianity-is-antisemitic well-documented]. And as for Pope Pius XII and the Holocaust, you're only sharing one side of the story. [https://forward.com/fast-forward/561324/newly-discovered-letter-shows-pope-pius-xii-almost-certainly-knew-about-nazi-death-camps/ New revelations have something different to say.]
 
:Pharisaic Judaism is the synagogue of Satan? You're applying a highly literal interpretation of Revelation 2:9 and 3:9—while to some extent in terms of typological significance, there is some relevance pertaining to ancient Smyrna, whose leader Polycarp's martyrdom was supported by Jews who brought the wood to burn him, it should be noted that "spiritual Jew = Christian." Since Revelation as a whole is highly symbolic, it more likely means "those who say they are ''Christians'' and are not." —[[User:LT|<code><span style="background:#FF8181">'''LT'''</span></code>]] '''''[[User talk:LT|<sup>Rev. 22:13</sup>]]''''' Thursday, 13:58, September 21, 2023 (EDT)
 
:Pharisaic Judaism is the synagogue of Satan? You're applying a highly literal interpretation of Revelation 2:9 and 3:9—while to some extent in terms of typological significance, there is some relevance pertaining to ancient Smyrna, whose leader Polycarp's martyrdom was supported by Jews who brought the wood to burn him, it should be noted that "spiritual Jew = Christian." Since Revelation as a whole is highly symbolic, it more likely means "those who say they are ''Christians'' and are not." —[[User:LT|<code><span style="background:#FF8181">'''LT'''</span></code>]] '''''[[User talk:LT|<sup>Rev. 22:13</sup>]]''''' Thursday, 13:58, September 21, 2023 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Geopolitics ==
 +
User:Conservative proudly has a series he labels: [[User:Conservative%27s_essays#Geopolitics|User:Conservative Essays: Geopolitics]]. Let's see how studied and knowledgeable he is to lay claim to use of that term. Using 2 articles from Wikipedia (yes, as a member of WP's Copy Editor's Guild I found a glaring error in one article, but that section won't be cited here), I will produce a simple narrative,
 +
 +
:''Haushofer ... specialty was to combine the fields of geography, history, economics, demography, political science, and anthropology into a new discipline that came to be called Geopolitik.
 +
 +
:''Geopolitik is a branch of 19th-century German statecraft, foreign policy and geostrategy. It developed from the writings of various German philosophers, geographers and thinkers, including Oswald Spengler (1880-1936), Alexander Humboldt (1769-1859), Karl Ritter (1779-1859), Friedrich Ratzel (1844-1904), the Swede Rudolf Kjellén (1864-1922), and Karl Haushofer (1869-1946).
 +
 +
So obviously Haushofer coined the term.
 +
 +
:''Haushofer was informally interrogated by Fr. Edmund A. Walsh on behalf of Nuremberg Trials prosecutor Robert H. Jackson to determine whether Haushofer should also stand trial. Fr. Walsh ultimately reported to Jackson that Haushofer was both legally and morally guilty of complicity in Nazi war crimes. Citing, "the role of geopolitics in corrupting education into a preparation for war", Walsh accused Haushofer and his associates of being, "basically as guilty as the better-known war criminals."[11] In his later memoir of the Nuremberg Trials, Walsh further alleged that, "The tragedy of Karl Haushofer", was his participation in the, "nationalizing", of academic scholarship and of turning Geopolitik into a weapon supplying, "an allegedly scientific basis and justification for international brigandage."[12]
 +
 +
But User:Conservative proudly wears the title of geopolitical expert.
 +
 +
:''Karl and Martha Haushofer died together in a suicide pact''
 +
 +
Just like Adolf and Eva or Magda and Joseph Goebbels. But these are the people User:Conservative claims intellectual kinship or being an heir. Need I go on?
 +
 +
:''Haushofer visited Landsberg prison [in 1927] to teach and mentor both [Rudolph] Hess and Hitler.''
 +
 +
:''Haushofer also coined the political use of the term [[Lebensraum]], which Hitler also used to justify both crimes against peace and [[genocide]].
 +
 +
But there is no indication User:Conservative is bothered by any of this in his [[Russophobic]] 'intellectual' pursuit.
 +
 +
:''in 1919, he forged a friendship with the young Rudolf Hess, who became his scientific assistant and later rose to be the deputy leader of the Nazi Party, second in authority only to Hitler. In 1919, Haushofer successfully defended his second dissertation, and became Privatdozent for political geography at Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, and was made a professor in 1933''
 +
 +
There was no such thing as "geopolitics" in 1933. Haushofer, Hess, and Hitler made it popular and successful. But User:Conservative is oblivious to facts or history. The Russians aren't. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 00:13, September 24, 2023 (EDT)
 +
 +
:This section is now addressing the analysis of an individual Conservapedia user, and therefore belongs in the community portal, not Talk:Main Page, since MPR isn't to advertise administrator intragripes. —[[User:LT|<code><span style="background:#FF8181">'''LT'''</span></code>]] '''''[[User talk:LT|<sup>Rev. 22:13</sup>]]''''' Sunday, 00:21, September 24, 2023 (EDT)
 +
 +
::The resident geopolitical expert steered the discussion in this direction by commenting on this thread, and this is a subject of vast import to MPR and CP's editorial stance. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 00:29, September 24, 2023 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::You decided to bait him into this discussion by making an accusation about his statements which was proven to be flat-out false, so once again, your assertion in an effort to excuse yourself lacks credibility. I hope this clarifies matters. —[[User:LT|<code><span style="background:#FF8181">'''LT'''</span></code>]] '''''[[User talk:LT|<sup>Rev. 22:13</sup>]]''''' Sunday, 00:33, September 24, 2023 (EDT)
SkipCaptcha
35,519

edits

Navigation menu