Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
295,703
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 438:
Line 438: + + + + + + Line 685:
Line 691: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Line 694:
Line 827: + + + + + + + + + + + Line 921:
Line 1,065: − + − *''[[The Hill]]:'' [https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/4227266-everyone-lost-the-second-debate-especially-the-audience/ Everyone Lost The Second Debate — Especially The Audience]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 23:42, September 28, 2023 (EDT) − *''[[Breitbart]]:'' [https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2023/09/27/unwatchable-viewers-blast-rnc-fox-for-including-univision-in-debate/ ‘Unwatchable’]. − − *''[[WSJ]]:'' [https://www.wsj.com/politics/elections/takeaways-from-the-second-gop-presidential-debate-45fcc7cd Republican Presidential Candidates Fail To Outshine Trump At Second Debate]. − : [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 23:46, September 28, 2023 (EDT) − − === Preview and Initial Thoughts === − − "Can DeSantis Reset? What to Watch for in the 2nd G.O.P. Debate. − The first matchup last month fueled momentum for Nikki Haley and a slide in standing for Ron DeSantis." − − https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/27/us/politics/republican-debate-trump-desantis-scott-haley.html [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]<sup>[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]</sup> 18:48, September 27, 2023 (EDT) − − :"Reset?" I thought he was doing great? This is like asking, "Can Zelensky reset?" after he destroyed 50% of the Russian Army. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 20:38, September 27, 2023 (EDT) − − That's the NYT, so it is liberal commentary. DeSantis is doing fine. Debate's started, but Moderators haven't given him enough time to speak. Still, he has got some of his ideas through. It'll be easier to judge how the debate went after it ends. For now, it's all fireworks. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]<sup>[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]</sup> 21:38, September 27, 2023 (EDT) − − Christie got a Zinger in about Donald Trump being "Donald Duck" for ducking the debates. He might have been reading Conservapedia, since I mentioned it here earlier! Lol. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]<sup>[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]</sup> 21:54, September 27, 2023 (EDT) − − :Without Trump, who leads everybody by 52 pts, the debate is a hoax. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 22:02, September 27, 2023 (EDT) − − :It's like NFL training camp for draftees and rookies - it's like asking Tom Brady to show up for tryouts. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 22:05, September 27, 2023 (EDT) − − Lol. "52". "The Public Opinion Strategies poll also found DeSantis closing the gap against Trump in a head-to-head matchup, with DeSantis having 40% support to Trump's 43% post-debate." − − "The poll also found that DeSantis topped the first debate, with 33% of respondents saying he was the strongest conservative on stage and 34% saying he can defeat Trump." [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]<sup>[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]</sup> 22:07, September 27, 2023 (EDT) https://www.foxnews.com/politics/iowa-poll-shows-desantis-closing-gap-trump-after-first-republican-debate − − :*[https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2023/09/27/fox-news-discounts-ad-prices-for-second-first-loser-debate/ FOX News Discounts Ad Prices for Second First Loser Debate] − :*[https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2023/09/27/republican-wall-street-donors-looking-to-nikki-haley-as-desantis-shrinks/ Republican Wall Street Donors Looking to Nikki Haley as DeSantis Shrinks] − :*[https://thepoliticalinsider.com/report-nikki-haley-getting-a-second-look-from-major-gop-donors-as-desantis-flounders/ Nikki Haley Getting A Second Look From Major GOP Donors As DeSantis Flounders] − :: [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 22:59, September 27, 2023 (EDT) − − Initial Thoughts. Moderation was a Complete Mess, but DeSantis did enough. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]<sup>[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]</sup> 23:08, September 27, 2023 (EDT) − − Fox News was biased against DeSantis. That was very clear, and it showed. But it doesn't matter. DeSantis did enough for a steady climb. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]<sup>[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]</sup> 23:20, September 27, 2023 (EDT) − − :Yah, of course. Fox ([[Rupert Murdoch]]) got off the DeSantis donkey and now is riding the Haly donkey. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 00:10, September 28, 2023 (EDT) − − === Independent: DeSantis and Nikki Haley were the Debate Winners === − − From: https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/us-politics/republican-debate-winner-desantis-b2419979.html − − '''"Winner: Ron DeSantis − ''' − For the past few months, the Florida governor has been plagued by attacks from the former president, who has taken to calling him “DeSanctimonious.” But right out the gate, Mr DeSantis took a swipe at his former political benefactor and was able to double-barrel an attack on President Joe Biden as well. − − “Donald Trump is missing an action,” he said. “He should be on this stage tonight. He owes it to you to defend his record, where they added $7.8 trillion to the debt that set the stage for the inflation that we have.” − − Similarly, Mr DeSantis was able to tout his record as governor, which was the whole reason that many Republican donors fell in love with him to begin with. He earned large applause lines throughout the debate." ... − − "Winner: Nikki Haley − − The former South Carolina governor has surged in the polls in recent months. That has given her the opportunity to earn money from donors and support from activists, even though she still faces a long shot to bear Mr Trump (she still trails him even in her home state). − − And indeed, throughout much of the debate, she did not engage in the mudslinging from the men on the stage. Similarly, she took many well-earned swipes against Mr Ramaswamy, whom she seems to have a special level of contempt for. Specifically, she told the political neophyte, “Honestly, every time I hear you, I feel a little bit dumber.” − − As Mr DeSantis’s poll numbers continue to decline, anti-Trump Republicans–or at least Republicans who think he would lose the presidency–will inevitably look for a new hope and this performance will certainly inspire confidence." − − I think a DeSantis-Haley 2024 Ticket is a winning combination. Hands down and without a doubt, imo, and some are already talking about it. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]<sup>[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]</sup> 00:07, September 28, 2023 (EDT) − − :Was there anybody else on stage? I don't know. I don't follow MSM. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 00:14, September 28, 2023 (EDT) − − There were 7 Candidates in total, so 5 others. Burgum and Scott might not be at the 3rd Debate. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]<sup>[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]</sup> 00:15, September 28, 2023 (EDT) − − :Burgum? Never heard of him (I'm serious). And consider myself somewhat politically well informed. I only spend about every waking moment consuming, analyzing or writing about it. − − :[[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 03:01, September 28, 2023 (EDT) − − === Hugh Hewitt praises Ron DeSantis Debate Performance: He was Very Presidential === − − “WALK-OFF HOME RUN” − − "HUGH HEWITT praises @RonDeSantis’ debate performance: “He was very presidential.” [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]<sup>[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]</sup> 00:15, September 28, 2023 (EDT) − − https://twitter.com/DeSantisWarRoom/status/1707239697263530486 − − ===IOWA FOCUS GROUP SAYS DESANTIS WAS THE CLEAR DEBATE WINNER=== − − IOWA FOCUS GROUP SAYS DESANTIS WAS THE CLEAR DEBATE WINNER. Video in link. − − https://twitter.com/DeSantisWarRoom/status/1707259091213602854 Nice. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]<sup>[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]</sup> 01:41, September 28, 2023 (EDT) − − ===DeSantis Says He Would Sign a 15-Week Abortion Ban as President=== − − DeSantis just won Iowa. It's over for Trump. He may as well drop out. − − I recall reading some 70% of Trump supporters in Iowa favor a 6 week ban. − − As news gets out of who is the Pro Life Conservative, the tide will shift. − − https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/28/us/politics/desantis-abortion-trump.html − − "In the chaos of Wednesday night’s noisy Republican presidential debate, Senator Tim Scott of South Carolina interrupted Gov. Ron DeSantis of Florida to pose a question on abortion that Mr. DeSantis had dodged directly answering for months. − − Would the Florida governor sign a “15-week limit” on abortion as president, Mr. Scott asked, talking over both Mr. DeSantis and Dana Perino, one of the moderators, in a way that made his full remarks difficult to hear. − − “Yes, I will,” Mr. DeSantis replied. − − The moment — which largely escaped attention in real time but was noted by The Daily Signal, a news website published by the conservative Heritage Foundation think tank — clarifies Mr. DeSantis’s position on abortion, an issue that has split the Republican primary field. Mr. DeSantis signed a six-week abortion ban in Florida this year, but had not clearly committed to supporting federal legislation restricting the termination of pregnancies." [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]<sup>[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]</sup> 21:26, September 28, 2023 (EDT) − − What did I tell you? Just saw this below. − − ===Trump in Trouble? Shocking New Poll Shows 79% of Iowa Republicans Considering Other Candidates=== − − Trump in Trouble? Shocking New Poll Shows 79% of Iowa Republicans Considering Other Candidates − − "The Republican political landscape might be shifting away from former President Donald Trump. − − A recent poll showed that the vast majority of GOP voters in Iowa are considering voting for one of the party candidates other than the former President, RadarOnline.com has learned." − − https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-in-trouble-shocking-new-poll-shows-79-of-iowa-republicans-considering-other-candidates/ar-AA1hmEXR?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=03d3825dec07475fb2ffee4e46696286&ei=33#image=1 [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]<sup>[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]</sup> 21:53, September 28, 2023 (EDT) − − From the above link, continued: "According to a recent CBS News/YouGov survey conducted in Iowa and New Hampshire between September 15-24, it appears that the former President's position in the Republican presidential primary is not as secure as previously thought. − − In Iowa, only 20% of voters are considering voting exclusively for Trump, while a significant 48% are weighing their options between him and other candidates. − − Shockingly, 31% of voters in Iowa have already ruled out voting for the former commander-in-chief altogether. This means that a staggering 79% of the electorate is either open to other candidates or committed to voting for someone other than Trump." [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]<sup>[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]</sup> 22:00, September 28, 2023 (EDT) − − == Thesis/antithesis deception game update: Canadian politics == − − This is what [[Pierre Poilievre]], the leader of the [[Conservative Party of Canada]] running against Trudeau, [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9M9py1yM4Y said]: − {{cquote|The Prime Minister has just said that he allowed the president of a war torn country who is perhaps the biggest target of false propaganda and of potential assassinations to be surrounded by hundreds of people who had not been vetted for their security background their potential risks that they present or in this case the massive diplomatic disasters that they could have brought to that event is he really saying that he did absolutely nothing to protect the Ukrainian president from all of those many risks.|||Pierre Poilievre, Sep. 27, 2023}} − − PoiLIEvre's logic makes no sense: a bunch of unvetted [[Ukronazi]]s would be a danger to ''their very own puppet führer Zelensky??!?'' If you think this through, ''what sense does that make at all?'' And the very fact alone that Poilievre is one-upping the Liberals to shill for the Ukrainian government demonstrates that something is very clearly wrong with him. − − The thesis/antithesis game is unfolding in Canada just as in the U.S. and everywhere else in the world: as a result of misery created by establishment globalist liberals, desperate masses are turning to the "right-wingers" to fix problems. When those same "right-wingers" gain power, they will institute an even more sinister agenda that the majority of this world didn't see coming because they were blinded by the god of this world. (2 Corinthians 4:4) —[[User:LT|<code><span style="background:#FF8181">'''LT'''</span></code>]] '''''[[User talk:LT|<sup>Rev. 22:13</sup>]]''''' Friday, 00:23, September 29, 2023 (EDT) − − Everyone who is reading this, '''ask yourself''': what if the greatest trick pulled off by the politicians across the spectrum was deceiving you into thinking that they support you over their rivals who they currently direct their anger towards, when in the end they collaborate together to compel you to worship the image of the beast they create, and all redirect that anger on you for acting in your godly conscience in refusing to comply with their Antichrist decree? —[[User:LT|<code><span style="background:#FF8181">'''LT'''</span></code>]] '''''[[User talk:LT|<sup>Rev. 22:13</sup>]]''''' Friday, 00:30, September 29, 2023 (EDT) − − == Elon Musk on Twitter Space with Ben Shapiro: Twitter is Not Anti Semitic == − − God Bless Devout Jewish Conservative Ben Shapiro. He rightly calls out the ADL, as we did here earlier, for pushing a radical left-wing agenda, and then falsely trying to smear Conservative Elon Musk as "Anti-Semitic" if he doesn't agree with their Radical Left-Wing Agenda. − − Good Discussion/Video of the Twitter Spaces link here https://twitter.com/i/status/1707578549698269242 [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]<sup>[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]</sup> 01:04, September 29, 2023 (EDT) − − Line 1,074:
Line 1,082: − − == Fox News: Poll finds DeSantis performed best, followed by Haley and Ramaswamy == − − "When polled following the debate, 33% of respondents thought DeSantis performed the best during the debate, followed by Haley at 18% and Ramaswamy at 15%." − − https://www.foxnews.com/politics/likely-gop-primary-voters-share-had-best-republican-debate-performance-poll [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]<sup>[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]</sup> 08:30, September 29, 2023 (EDT) − − :Now this is the very definition of a "skewed poll" when a declared candidate who received more votes than any incumbent president isn't even included. To use a vulgar term, it's what you call an [[establishment]] [https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=circle%20jerk circlejerk]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 09:49, September 29, 2023 (EDT)
no edit summary
=== Was Communism as Bad as Nazism? Indisputably, yes it was. And Frankly, it was much worse. The Record and Stats/Figures show it ===
=== Was Communism as Bad as Nazism? Indisputably, yes it was. And Frankly, it was much worse. The Record and Stats/Figures show it ===
''Moved to: [[Conservapedia:Community Portal#Was Communism as Bad as Nazism? Indisputably, yes it was. And Frankly, it was much worse. The Record and Stats/Figures show it]]
''Moved to: [[Conservapedia:Community Portal#Was Communism as Bad as Nazism? Indisputably, yes it was. And Frankly, it was much worse. The Record and Stats/Figures show it]]
===Elon Musk on Twitter Space with Ben Shapiro: Twitter is Not Anti Semitic ===
God Bless Devout Jewish Conservative Ben Shapiro. He rightly calls out the ADL, as we did here earlier, for pushing a radical left-wing agenda, and then falsely trying to smear Conservative Elon Musk as "Anti-Semitic" if he doesn't agree with their Radical Left-Wing Agenda.
Good Discussion/Video of the Twitter Spaces link here https://twitter.com/i/status/1707578549698269242 [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]<sup>[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]</sup> 01:04, September 29, 2023 (EDT)
===Nordstream===
===Nordstream===
Also, nobody is more Popular than Jesus Christ Our Lord. Jesus Christ is believed in and confessed as Lord and Savior and Son of God, by 2.6 BN Christians, and believed in as the True Messiah and a Virgin-Born Wonder-Working Prophet of God by a further 2 Billion Muslims, which together accounts for nearly 5 Billion People. Not to mention respected by many Hindus, Atheists, Buddhists, Humanitarians etc. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]<sup>[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]</sup> 17:35, September 25, 2023 (EDT)
Also, nobody is more Popular than Jesus Christ Our Lord. Jesus Christ is believed in and confessed as Lord and Savior and Son of God, by 2.6 BN Christians, and believed in as the True Messiah and a Virgin-Born Wonder-Working Prophet of God by a further 2 Billion Muslims, which together accounts for nearly 5 Billion People. Not to mention respected by many Hindus, Atheists, Buddhists, Humanitarians etc. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]<sup>[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]</sup> 17:35, September 25, 2023 (EDT)
===Debate Night Highlights and Updates===
*''[[The Hill]]:'' [https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/4227266-everyone-lost-the-second-debate-especially-the-audience/ Everyone Lost The Second Debate — Especially The Audience]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 23:42, September 28, 2023 (EDT)
*''[[Breitbart]]:'' [https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2023/09/27/unwatchable-viewers-blast-rnc-fox-for-including-univision-in-debate/ ‘Unwatchable’].
*''[[WSJ]]:'' [https://www.wsj.com/politics/elections/takeaways-from-the-second-gop-presidential-debate-45fcc7cd Republican Presidential Candidates Fail To Outshine Trump At Second Debate].
: [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 23:46, September 28, 2023 (EDT)
=== Preview and Initial Thoughts ===
"Can DeSantis Reset? What to Watch for in the 2nd G.O.P. Debate.
The first matchup last month fueled momentum for Nikki Haley and a slide in standing for Ron DeSantis."
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/27/us/politics/republican-debate-trump-desantis-scott-haley.html [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]<sup>[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]</sup> 18:48, September 27, 2023 (EDT)
:"Reset?" I thought he was doing great? This is like asking, "Can Zelensky reset?" after he destroyed 50% of the Russian Army. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 20:38, September 27, 2023 (EDT)
That's the NYT, so it is liberal commentary. DeSantis is doing fine. Debate's started, but Moderators haven't given him enough time to speak. Still, he has got some of his ideas through. It'll be easier to judge how the debate went after it ends. For now, it's all fireworks. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]<sup>[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]</sup> 21:38, September 27, 2023 (EDT)
Christie got a Zinger in about Donald Trump being "Donald Duck" for ducking the debates. He might have been reading Conservapedia, since I mentioned it here earlier! Lol. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]<sup>[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]</sup> 21:54, September 27, 2023 (EDT)
:Without Trump, who leads everybody by 52 pts, the debate is a hoax. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 22:02, September 27, 2023 (EDT)
:It's like NFL training camp for draftees and rookies - it's like asking Tom Brady to show up for tryouts. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 22:05, September 27, 2023 (EDT)
Lol. "52". "The Public Opinion Strategies poll also found DeSantis closing the gap against Trump in a head-to-head matchup, with DeSantis having 40% support to Trump's 43% post-debate."
"The poll also found that DeSantis topped the first debate, with 33% of respondents saying he was the strongest conservative on stage and 34% saying he can defeat Trump." [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]<sup>[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]</sup> 22:07, September 27, 2023 (EDT) https://www.foxnews.com/politics/iowa-poll-shows-desantis-closing-gap-trump-after-first-republican-debate
:*[https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2023/09/27/fox-news-discounts-ad-prices-for-second-first-loser-debate/ FOX News Discounts Ad Prices for Second First Loser Debate]
:*[https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2023/09/27/republican-wall-street-donors-looking-to-nikki-haley-as-desantis-shrinks/ Republican Wall Street Donors Looking to Nikki Haley as DeSantis Shrinks]
:*[https://thepoliticalinsider.com/report-nikki-haley-getting-a-second-look-from-major-gop-donors-as-desantis-flounders/ Nikki Haley Getting A Second Look From Major GOP Donors As DeSantis Flounders]
:: [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 22:59, September 27, 2023 (EDT)
Initial Thoughts. Moderation was a Complete Mess, but DeSantis did enough. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]<sup>[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]</sup> 23:08, September 27, 2023 (EDT)
Fox News was biased against DeSantis. That was very clear, and it showed. But it doesn't matter. DeSantis did enough for a steady climb. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]<sup>[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]</sup> 23:20, September 27, 2023 (EDT)
:Yah, of course. Fox ([[Rupert Murdoch]]) got off the DeSantis donkey and now is riding the Haly donkey. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 00:10, September 28, 2023 (EDT)
=== Independent: DeSantis and Nikki Haley were the Debate Winners ===
From: https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/us-politics/republican-debate-winner-desantis-b2419979.html
'''"Winner: Ron DeSantis
'''
For the past few months, the Florida governor has been plagued by attacks from the former president, who has taken to calling him “DeSanctimonious.” But right out the gate, Mr DeSantis took a swipe at his former political benefactor and was able to double-barrel an attack on President Joe Biden as well.
“Donald Trump is missing an action,” he said. “He should be on this stage tonight. He owes it to you to defend his record, where they added $7.8 trillion to the debt that set the stage for the inflation that we have.”
Similarly, Mr DeSantis was able to tout his record as governor, which was the whole reason that many Republican donors fell in love with him to begin with. He earned large applause lines throughout the debate." ...
"Winner: Nikki Haley
The former South Carolina governor has surged in the polls in recent months. That has given her the opportunity to earn money from donors and support from activists, even though she still faces a long shot to bear Mr Trump (she still trails him even in her home state).
And indeed, throughout much of the debate, she did not engage in the mudslinging from the men on the stage. Similarly, she took many well-earned swipes against Mr Ramaswamy, whom she seems to have a special level of contempt for. Specifically, she told the political neophyte, “Honestly, every time I hear you, I feel a little bit dumber.”
As Mr DeSantis’s poll numbers continue to decline, anti-Trump Republicans–or at least Republicans who think he would lose the presidency–will inevitably look for a new hope and this performance will certainly inspire confidence."
I think a DeSantis-Haley 2024 Ticket is a winning combination. Hands down and without a doubt, imo, and some are already talking about it. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]<sup>[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]</sup> 00:07, September 28, 2023 (EDT)
:Was there anybody else on stage? I don't know. I don't follow MSM. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 00:14, September 28, 2023 (EDT)
There were 7 Candidates in total, so 5 others. Burgum and Scott might not be at the 3rd Debate. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]<sup>[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]</sup> 00:15, September 28, 2023 (EDT)
:Burgum? Never heard of him (I'm serious). And consider myself somewhat politically well informed. I only spend about every waking moment consuming, analyzing or writing about it.
:[[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 03:01, September 28, 2023 (EDT)
=== Hugh Hewitt praises Ron DeSantis Debate Performance: He was Very Presidential ===
“WALK-OFF HOME RUN”
"HUGH HEWITT praises @RonDeSantis’ debate performance: “He was very presidential.” [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]<sup>[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]</sup> 00:15, September 28, 2023 (EDT)
https://twitter.com/DeSantisWarRoom/status/1707239697263530486
===IOWA FOCUS GROUP SAYS DESANTIS WAS THE CLEAR DEBATE WINNER===
IOWA FOCUS GROUP SAYS DESANTIS WAS THE CLEAR DEBATE WINNER. Video in link.
https://twitter.com/DeSantisWarRoom/status/1707259091213602854 Nice. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]<sup>[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]</sup> 01:41, September 28, 2023 (EDT)
===DeSantis Says He Would Sign a 15-Week Abortion Ban as President===
DeSantis just won Iowa. It's over for Trump. He may as well drop out.
I recall reading some 70% of Trump supporters in Iowa favor a 6 week ban.
As news gets out of who is the Pro Life Conservative, the tide will shift.
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/28/us/politics/desantis-abortion-trump.html
"In the chaos of Wednesday night’s noisy Republican presidential debate, Senator Tim Scott of South Carolina interrupted Gov. Ron DeSantis of Florida to pose a question on abortion that Mr. DeSantis had dodged directly answering for months.
Would the Florida governor sign a “15-week limit” on abortion as president, Mr. Scott asked, talking over both Mr. DeSantis and Dana Perino, one of the moderators, in a way that made his full remarks difficult to hear.
“Yes, I will,” Mr. DeSantis replied.
The moment — which largely escaped attention in real time but was noted by The Daily Signal, a news website published by the conservative Heritage Foundation think tank — clarifies Mr. DeSantis’s position on abortion, an issue that has split the Republican primary field. Mr. DeSantis signed a six-week abortion ban in Florida this year, but had not clearly committed to supporting federal legislation restricting the termination of pregnancies." [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]<sup>[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]</sup> 21:26, September 28, 2023 (EDT)
What did I tell you? Just saw this below.
===Trump in Trouble? Shocking New Poll Shows 79% of Iowa Republicans Considering Other Candidates===
Trump in Trouble? Shocking New Poll Shows 79% of Iowa Republicans Considering Other Candidates
"The Republican political landscape might be shifting away from former President Donald Trump.
A recent poll showed that the vast majority of GOP voters in Iowa are considering voting for one of the party candidates other than the former President, RadarOnline.com has learned."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-in-trouble-shocking-new-poll-shows-79-of-iowa-republicans-considering-other-candidates/ar-AA1hmEXR?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=03d3825dec07475fb2ffee4e46696286&ei=33#image=1 [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]<sup>[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]</sup> 21:53, September 28, 2023 (EDT)
From the above link, continued: "According to a recent CBS News/YouGov survey conducted in Iowa and New Hampshire between September 15-24, it appears that the former President's position in the Republican presidential primary is not as secure as previously thought.
In Iowa, only 20% of voters are considering voting exclusively for Trump, while a significant 48% are weighing their options between him and other candidates.
Shockingly, 31% of voters in Iowa have already ruled out voting for the former commander-in-chief altogether. This means that a staggering 79% of the electorate is either open to other candidates or committed to voting for someone other than Trump." [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]<sup>[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]</sup> 22:00, September 28, 2023 (EDT)
===Fox News: Poll finds DeSantis performed best, followed by Haley and Ramaswamy===
"When polled following the debate, 33% of respondents thought DeSantis performed the best during the debate, followed by Haley at 18% and Ramaswamy at 15%."
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/likely-gop-primary-voters-share-had-best-republican-debate-performance-poll [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]<sup>[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]</sup> 08:30, September 29, 2023 (EDT)
:Now this is the very definition of a "skewed poll" when a declared candidate who received more votes than any incumbent president isn't even included. To use a vulgar term, it's what you call an [[establishment]] [https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=circle%20jerk circlejerk]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 09:49, September 29, 2023 (EDT)
==India-Canada news==
==India-Canada news==
*Korybko: [https://korybko.substack.com/p/interpreting-blinkens-remarks-on Blinken’s Remarks On The Indian-Canadian Dispute]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 11:36, September 23, 2023 (EDT)
*Korybko: [https://korybko.substack.com/p/interpreting-blinkens-remarks-on Blinken’s Remarks On The Indian-Canadian Dispute]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 11:36, September 23, 2023 (EDT)
*[https://www.asiasentinel.com/p/impasse-as-trudeau-fails-assassination-claim Impasse as Trudeau Fails With Assassination Claim]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 23:03, September 27, 2023 (EDT)
*[https://www.asiasentinel.com/p/impasse-as-trudeau-fails-assassination-claim Impasse as Trudeau Fails With Assassination Claim]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 23:03, September 27, 2023 (EDT)
===Thesis/antithesis deception game update: Canadian politics===
This is what [[Pierre Poilievre]], the leader of the [[Conservative Party of Canada]] running against Trudeau, [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9M9py1yM4Y said]:
{{cquote|The Prime Minister has just said that he allowed the president of a war torn country who is perhaps the biggest target of false propaganda and of potential assassinations to be surrounded by hundreds of people who had not been vetted for their security background their potential risks that they present or in this case the massive diplomatic disasters that they could have brought to that event is he really saying that he did absolutely nothing to protect the Ukrainian president from all of those many risks.|||Pierre Poilievre, Sep. 27, 2023}}
PoiLIEvre's logic makes no sense: a bunch of unvetted [[Ukronazi]]s would be a danger to ''their very own puppet führer Zelensky??!?'' If you think this through, ''what sense does that make at all?'' And the very fact alone that Poilievre is one-upping the Liberals to shill for the Ukrainian government demonstrates that something is very clearly wrong with him.
The thesis/antithesis game is unfolding in Canada just as in the U.S. and everywhere else in the world: as a result of misery created by establishment globalist liberals, desperate masses are turning to the "right-wingers" to fix problems. When those same "right-wingers" gain power, they will institute an even more sinister agenda that the majority of this world didn't see coming because they were blinded by the god of this world. (2 Corinthians 4:4) —[[User:LT|<code><span style="background:#FF8181">'''LT'''</span></code>]] '''''[[User talk:LT|<sup>Rev. 22:13</sup>]]''''' Friday, 00:23, September 29, 2023 (EDT)
Everyone who is reading this, '''ask yourself''': what if the greatest trick pulled off by the politicians across the spectrum was deceiving you into thinking that they support you over their rivals who they currently direct their anger towards, when in the end they collaborate together to compel you to worship the image of the beast they create, and all redirect that anger on you for acting in your godly conscience in refusing to comply with their Antichrist decree? —[[User:LT|<code><span style="background:#FF8181">'''LT'''</span></code>]] '''''[[User talk:LT|<sup>Rev. 22:13</sup>]]''''' Friday, 00:30, September 29, 2023 (EDT)
==NATO war news==
==NATO war news==
"9 Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee." (Revelation 3:9, KJV) [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]<sup>[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]</sup> 17:13, September 26, 2023 (EDT)
"9 Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee." (Revelation 3:9, KJV) [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]<sup>[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]</sup> 17:13, September 26, 2023 (EDT)
== Debate Night Highlights and Updates ==
===Reminder: The "End of the World" and 7 Year Tribulation cannot come until the Great Commission is Complete===
== Reminder: The "End of the World" and 7 Year Tribulation cannot come until the Great Commission is Complete ==
This is relevant in light of certain people saying earlier "the world may end by 2027" and so on. Not only is that absolutely impossible because it's only 4 years away, and a 7 year tribulation must come, but also because, for even that Tribulation of Anti-Christ to begin, the Great Commission must be completed first, as Jesus Christ explains in Mat 24:14. Joshua Project estimates around 2 Billion People have not yet heard the Gospel, and at a Conservative estimate that it will take 5-7 years to reach 500 MN people, it's a safe bet that there are at least 20-30 years to go before the End of Time, though of course, as the Lord reminded His Apostles, only the Eternal Father knows the day.
This is relevant in light of certain people saying earlier "the world may end by 2027" and so on. Not only is that absolutely impossible because it's only 4 years away, and a 7 year tribulation must come, but also because, for even that Tribulation of Anti-Christ to begin, the Great Commission must be completed first, as Jesus Christ explains in Mat 24:14. Joshua Project estimates around 2 Billion People have not yet heard the Gospel, and at a Conservative estimate that it will take 5-7 years to reach 500 MN people, it's a safe bet that there are at least 20-30 years to go before the End of Time, though of course, as the Lord reminded His Apostles, only the Eternal Father knows the day.
https://www.reasonablefaith.org/podcasts/defenders-podcast-series-3/s3-doctrine-of-the-last-things/doctrine-of-the-last-things-part-16[[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]<sup>[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]</sup> 01:10, September 29, 2023 (EDT)
https://www.reasonablefaith.org/podcasts/defenders-podcast-series-3/s3-doctrine-of-the-last-things/doctrine-of-the-last-things-part-16[[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]<sup>[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]</sup> 01:10, September 29, 2023 (EDT)