| Line 587: |
Line 587: |
| | ::::::::Since the UN Charter, which all party member states agreed to, the United States arrogated to itself the role of maker and enforcer of the [[rules based order]], which no one outside the [[collective West]] agreed to. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 13:29, October 6, 2023 (EDT) | | ::::::::Since the UN Charter, which all party member states agreed to, the United States arrogated to itself the role of maker and enforcer of the [[rules based order]], which no one outside the [[collective West]] agreed to. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 13:29, October 6, 2023 (EDT) |
| | ::::::::I asked first, so please answer the question. But I will still answer yours: NATO cannot and should not commit war crimes. War crimes have been committed by both sides in this conflict. Both sides should be condemned. [[User:MayGodBless|MayGodBless]] ([[User talk:MayGodBless|talk]]) 15:10, October 6, 2023 (EDT) | | ::::::::I asked first, so please answer the question. But I will still answer yours: NATO cannot and should not commit war crimes. War crimes have been committed by both sides in this conflict. Both sides should be condemned. [[User:MayGodBless|MayGodBless]] ([[User talk:MayGodBless|talk]]) 15:10, October 6, 2023 (EDT) |
| | + | :::::::::Not first committed war crimes in the [[Kosovo war]], then again in Iraq, Libya, and Syria. It threw the UN Charter, which all parties had agreed to, more than 20 years ago in favor of its diktats of what international law is. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 16:52, October 6, 2023 (EDT) |
| | ::::::::And the US is far and away the most powerful member of the UN. Russia does not come close. | | ::::::::And the US is far and away the most powerful member of the UN. Russia does not come close. |
| | ::::::::When the US was founded, the [[Constitution]] made clear that the capital would not be part of any state, and thus [[Washington, DC]] was created. When the UN was founded, the members unanimously approved putting its permanent seat of government in – you guessed it – the United States. [[User:MayGodBless|MayGodBless]] ([[User talk:MayGodBless|talk]]) 15:14, October 6, 2023 (EDT) | | ::::::::When the US was founded, the [[Constitution]] made clear that the capital would not be part of any state, and thus [[Washington, DC]] was created. When the UN was founded, the members unanimously approved putting its permanent seat of government in – you guessed it – the United States. [[User:MayGodBless|MayGodBless]] ([[User talk:MayGodBless|talk]]) 15:14, October 6, 2023 (EDT) |
| | + | :::::::::The US was just defeated on the battlefield, again. The US in the renegade party from what was previous international agreements to keep the peace and maintain international order. 16:52, October 6, 2023 (EDT)[[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> |
| | I have no understanding of geopolitics? "We are not in a multipolar world." - International Relations and Security Analyst Mark Sleboda on Brian Berlectic's pro-Russia New Atlas YouTube channel. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pK4SZ5IzeRE&t=7577s] See: [[Essay: The myth of multipolarity. What do the terms unipolar, bipolar and multipolar mean as far as international relations?|The myth of multipolarity. What do the terms unipolar, bipolar and multipolar mean as far as international relations?]] | | I have no understanding of geopolitics? "We are not in a multipolar world." - International Relations and Security Analyst Mark Sleboda on Brian Berlectic's pro-Russia New Atlas YouTube channel. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pK4SZ5IzeRE&t=7577s] See: [[Essay: The myth of multipolarity. What do the terms unipolar, bipolar and multipolar mean as far as international relations?|The myth of multipolarity. What do the terms unipolar, bipolar and multipolar mean as far as international relations?]] |
| | | | |