SkipCaptcha
334
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 81:
Line 81: + + + + +
no edit summary
OK I now understand: she acts like a "Lady", or uppercrust person, with her spending of public money. Thanks! --[[User:RobLeonardWoo|RobLeonardWoo]] ([[User talk:RobLeonardWoo|talk]]) 09:25, August 5, 2022 (EDT)
OK I now understand: she acts like a "Lady", or uppercrust person, with her spending of public money. Thanks! --[[User:RobLeonardWoo|RobLeonardWoo]] ([[User talk:RobLeonardWoo|talk]]) 09:25, August 5, 2022 (EDT)
== Lunacy ==
For the people wanting this article to reflect reality and not show Conservapedia as anything but a repository to make conservatives look foolish, I recommend they give it up. The craziness starts immediately with sowing doubts about whether Michelle Obama was born female. It goes off the deep end when the second paragraph touts ''substantial'' evidence for Obama being a transgender man then stating she used IVF treatments to conceive her children. If someone wanted to write something that made conservatives look completely stupid, all they have to do is look here and wonder how someone can claim IVF treatments could possibly make a biological man pregnant. The photoshopped pictures are the final nail in the coffin.
By the way, pictures of the Obama’s infant children are here. [https://www.elitedaily.com/news/barack-michelle-obama-post-malia-baby-pics-24th-birthday] --[[User:LSimons|LSimons]] ([[User talk:LSimons|talk]]) 13:46, October 17, 2023 (EDT)
==Refs==
==Refs==
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}