Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
295,634
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 39:
Line 39: + +
→Hollywood values
:The issue is little different than the Bud Lite/Dylan Mulvaney controversy. Consumers may boycott a movie here and there (Sorcese's ''Passion of Christ'', for example), but the whole industry, or at least one major production and distribution company (like Budweiser; perhaps Netflix) to start with to send the industry a message. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 18:00, November 6, 2023 (EST)
:The issue is little different than the Bud Lite/Dylan Mulvaney controversy. Consumers may boycott a movie here and there (Sorcese's ''Passion of Christ'', for example), but the whole industry, or at least one major production and distribution company (like Budweiser; perhaps Netflix) to start with to send the industry a message. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 18:00, November 6, 2023 (EST)
:As to conservative movies being "more successful", they are so rare, conservatives flock to see it. Again, market demand and market efficiency is at work: the industry has it figured out that they would make as much money making 1 conservative movie per year (to "fill a niche") vs. making 12 per year over 12 months. And it's more cost efficient (the reduction in operating costs and pent-up demand also leaves more money for higher quality in script writing and production value than usual. So Hollywood producers recognize the "conservative market" is not an extinct market, so they give them what they want and take their money once a year or so). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 18:15, November 6, 2023 (EST)