469
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 13:
Line 13: + +
Talk:Fox Derangement Syndrome (view source)
Revision as of 20:50, June 17, 2007
, 20:50, June 17, 2007no edit summary
:::Yes, and many people write many books with many chapter titles, but that doesn't make them real phrases that have made it into the language. Are you sure Goldberg didn't coin the phrase himself? Please give some evidence that it is a real phrase other than "proof by repeated assertion."
:::Yes, and many people write many books with many chapter titles, but that doesn't make them real phrases that have made it into the language. Are you sure Goldberg didn't coin the phrase himself? Please give some evidence that it is a real phrase other than "proof by repeated assertion."
:::I think you just like Goldberg's phrase and are trying to promote it. As of today it gets 33 Google hits ''on the web.'' That's utterly negligible. When it gets to a couple of thousand, which at this rate will take several years, it may deserve an article. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 15:07, 17 June 2007 (EDT)
:::I think you just like Goldberg's phrase and are trying to promote it. As of today it gets 33 Google hits ''on the web.'' That's utterly negligible. When it gets to a couple of thousand, which at this rate will take several years, it may deserve an article. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 15:07, 17 June 2007 (EDT)
*Dpbsmith, I'm tempted to call you an idiot. Goldberg didn't coin the term. It was used on Michelle Malkin's site well over a year before his book was published. You know, just because you've never heard of "Fox Derangement Syndrome" doesn't mean it's not a legit term. You apparently have the ego of a liberal. Take your biased agenda to Wikipedia, where you will be more at home. This is Conservapedia! -- [[User:AmeriCan|AmeriCan]]