Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Other derangement syndromes. Are they "legit?"
Line 15: Line 15:     
*Dpbsmith, I'm tempted to call you an idiot. Goldberg didn't coin the term. It was used on Michelle Malkin's site well over a year before his book was published. You know, just because you've never heard of "Fox Derangement Syndrome" doesn't mean it's not a legit term. You apparently have the ego of a liberal. Take your biased agenda to Wikipedia, where you will be more at home. This is Conservapedia! -- [[User:AmeriCan|AmeriCan]]
 
*Dpbsmith, I'm tempted to call you an idiot. Goldberg didn't coin the term. It was used on Michelle Malkin's site well over a year before his book was published. You know, just because you've never heard of "Fox Derangement Syndrome" doesn't mean it's not a legit term. You apparently have the ego of a liberal. Take your biased agenda to Wikipedia, where you will be more at home. This is Conservapedia! -- [[User:AmeriCan|AmeriCan]]
 +
 +
::You're right about Michelle Malkin using it before Goldberg, my apologies. (Does Goldberg's book credit her as the originator? That would be good to have in any discussion of the term).
 +
::Malkin also has used [http://michellemalkin.com/archives/005376.htm Rove Derangement Syndrome], [http://michellemalkin.com/archives/005831.htm Condi Derangement Syndrome], [http://michellemalkin.com/archives/006584.htm?print=1 Laura Bush Derangement Syndrome], [http://michellemalkin.com/archives/006820.htm?print=1 Iraq Derangement Syndrome], [http://michellemalkin.com/archives/007499.htm?print=1 Rush Derangement Syndrome], [http://michellemalkin.com/archives/006391.htm?print=1 Diebold Derangement Syndrome], and [Cheney Derangement Syndrome]. Are these legit? Should we have articles on them? What would you suggest as a criterion for deciding which of these are important terms that deserve Conservapedia articles? [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 22:01, 17 June 2007 (EDT)
4,994

edits

Navigation menu